Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface? - SOLVED!

On Friday 27 April 2007 05:22, Bill Marriott wrote: > - My Revolution folder is on the desktop. I downloaded the tar.gz file > there and simply extracted. I double-click revolution.x86 to run it. > > - I would put it into /opt, if that's where it's supposed to be, but > Ubuntu tells me I don't have

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface?

Chris Bohnert wrote: Hi Mark, Glad I could help.. Maybe you can answer a question for me. Does Ubuntu have a nifty package manager or does it rely on apt-get? Will Ubuntu begin moving to CNR with the Linspire partnership? --

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface?

chris- Thursday, April 26, 2007, 8:04:48 PM, you wrote: > Maybe you can answer a question for me. Does Ubuntu have a nifty package > manager or does it rely on apt-get? Will Ubuntu begin moving to CNR with > the Linspire partnership? Yes to both. Adept is the gui package manager (front end to

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface? - SOLVED!

On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:30:00 -0400, Bill Marriott wrote: > I'm noticing that Ubuntu is crashing like crazy with Rev set up to > use GTK. If I drag a tab control out, it's all corrupted. It isn't > long till the whole thing locks up. Maybe it's best to stick with > Motif until 2.9 is out? Don't

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface? - SOLVED!

I'm noticing that Ubuntu is crashing like crazy with Rev set up to use GTK. If I drag a tab control out, it's all corrupted. It isn't long till the whole thing locks up. Maybe it's best to stick with Motif until 2.9 is out? "Bill Marriott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTE

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface? - SOLVED!

Ken, Thanks for the additional pointers. Here's what I had to do to get things to work: 1) I updated the revolution.sh script with the path to my Rev installation 2) I verified that all the files existed 3) When I double-clicked it and selected "run" (Ubuntu asks you if you want to display th

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface? - SOLVED!

On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:22:32 -0400, Bill Marriott wrote: > - I'm using Ubuntu Edgy Eft, 6.10, under Parallels if that matters. It doesn't; I've done my testing in both Parallels and on its own PC - same results. > - I made the recommended changes to the revolution.sh file in my > Revolution-2

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface?

Hi Mark, Glad I could help.. Maybe you can answer a question for me. Does Ubuntu have a nifty package manager or does it rely on apt-get? Will Ubuntu begin moving to CNR with the Linspire partnership? -- cb On 4/26/07, Mark Wieder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: chris- Tuesday, April 24, 2007,

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface?

chris- Tuesday, April 24, 2007, 2:47:15 PM, you wrote: > REV_GDK_PATH /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so > REV_GTK_PATH /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so > REV_GOBJECT_PATH /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so ...and thanks for the help pinning this down... -- -Mark Wieder [EMAIL PROTECTED] _

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface? - SOLVED!

Ok, I'm more than a little confused now. :) Of course, I don't know what I'm doing on Linux. - I'm using Ubuntu Edgy Eft, 6.10, under Parallels if that matters. - I made the recommended changes to the revolution.sh file in my Revolution-2.6.1 folder. I didn't notice any changes/effects; Rev st

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface? - SOLVED!

chris- Wednesday, April 25, 2007, 7:07:19 AM, you wrote: > To my knowledge rev doesn't use libQT. It depends solely on the gtk libs. > Which isn't really a big deal..but it does require the gtk libs be hanging > around on your system to make it work correctly. Is it possible that Marks > insta

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface? - SOLVED!

On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:07:19 -0500, chris bohnert wrote: > Ken, > > To my knowledge rev doesn't use libQT. It depends solely on the gtk libs. > Which isn't really a big deal..but it does require the gtk libs be hanging > around on your system to make it work correctly. Is it possible that Mark

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface? - SOLVED!

Ken, To my knowledge rev doesn't use libQT. It depends solely on the gtk libs. Which isn't really a big deal..but it does require the gtk libs be hanging around on your system to make it work correctly. Is it possible that Marks installation was an upgrade and yours was a clean install? There

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface? - SOLVED!

On Wednesday 25 April 2007 15:59, Ken Ray wrote: > > Well yes, KDE would be using QT not GTK. A KDE only install may not > > have the > > GTK libraries at all, as far as I have seen. > > So what would the filenames be that I should point Rev's > 'revolution.sh' exports to? I'm not sure. You could

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface? - SOLVED!

On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:42:28 +1000, Rishi Viner wrote: > On Wednesday 25 April 2007 13:48, Ken Ray wrote: >>> You can bet this is going on my Tips page! I'm going to check on >>> Kubuntu, but I'll bet it's the same issue there as well... >> >> Well, *sort of*... on Kubuntu, there *is* a libgobjec

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface? - SOLVED!

On Wednesday 25 April 2007 13:30, Ken Ray wrote: > It turns out that the 'revolution.sh' file included an 'export' for > GDK_PATH and GTK_PATH, but NOT GOBJECT_PATH... and after adding that > in, I got the current Ubuntu widget theme! Getting back to the differences between your widgets and Marks,

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface? - SOLVED!

On Wednesday 25 April 2007 14:12, J. Landman Gay wrote: > Is this something the team should know about for the next Linux build? He He! It is like waiting for Christmas! ;) -- Rishi Australia ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface? - SOLVED!

On Wednesday 25 April 2007 13:48, Ken Ray wrote: > > You can bet this is going on my Tips page! I'm going to check on > > Kubuntu, but I'll bet it's the same issue there as well... > > Well, *sort of*... on Kubuntu, there *is* a libgobject in /usr/lib, but > there is NOT a libgdk or libgtk... are t

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface? - SOLVED!

On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:12:20 -0500, J. Landman Gay wrote: > Ken Ray wrote: > >> It turns out that the 'revolution.sh' file included an 'export' for >> GDK_PATH and GTK_PATH, but NOT GOBJECT_PATH... and after adding that >> in, I got the current Ubuntu widget theme! > > Is this something the te

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface? - SOLVED!

Ken Ray wrote: It turns out that the 'revolution.sh' file included an 'export' for GDK_PATH and GTK_PATH, but NOT GOBJECT_PATH... and after adding that in, I got the current Ubuntu widget theme! Is this something the team should know about for the next Linux build? -- Jacqueline Landman Gay

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface? - SOLVED!

> You can bet this is going on my Tips page! I'm going to check on > Kubuntu, but I'll bet it's the same issue there as well... Well, *sort of*... on Kubuntu, there *is* a libgobject in /usr/lib, but there is NOT a libgdk or libgtk... are these supposed to be there? Or is there some other set o

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface? - SOLVED!

On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:47:15 -0600, chris bohnert wrote: > You might try something like setting the following environment variables. > I'm assuming Ubuntu puts the gtk libs in /usr/lib..but it might not. You > might also compare Marks location for the libs to yours. > > REV_GDK_PATH /usr/lib/lib

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface?

Hi Ken, Yep..they're definitely needed...did you try creating a symbolic link so you had the .so linked to the versioned files that are present? Alternately you can set REV_GDK_PATH /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 REV_GTK_PATH /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 REV_

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface?

On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:45:12 +1000, Rishi Viner wrote: > It looks like you both have the same "Window Decorations", but you > are using > different "Widget Styles". This could have been changed by one or the other > of you by changing the "Syle" in the KDE Theme Manager or by changing > "Style

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface?

On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:09:56 -0500, Ken Ray wrote: > On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:47:15 -0600, chris bohnert wrote: > >> REV_GDK_PATH /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so >> REV_GTK_PATH /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so >> REV_GOBJECT_PATH /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so > > Odd, all of my .so files in /usr/lib have text

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface?

On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:47:15 -0600, chris bohnert wrote: > REV_GDK_PATH /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so > REV_GTK_PATH /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so > REV_GOBJECT_PATH /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so Odd, all of my .so files in /usr/lib have text after the ".so", as in: /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 /usr

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface?

On Wednesday 25 April 2007 05:52, Ken Ray wrote: > No, it's not the colors and titlebar decorations that I'm talking about > - those change - it's the internal controls (buttons, fields, menus, > etc.). I've been working on RevZilla 2.1 (which is almost ready to be > released, btw), and Mark and I

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface?

On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:47:15 -0600, chris bohnert wrote: > Hi Ken, > > Could it be that your system doesn't know where to load GTK+ from. I've > always assumed that the libdl dependency in rev. is being used to load the > gnome widget libraries among other things. ( I could be completely wrong o

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface?

Hi Ken, Could it be that your system doesn't know where to load GTK+ from. I've always assumed that the libdl dependency in rev. is being used to load the gnome widget libraries among other things. ( I could be completely wrong of course :-) ) You might try something like setting the following

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface?

On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:58:48 -0500, J. Landman Gay wrote: > Ken Ray wrote: > >> No, it's not the colors and titlebar decorations that I'm talking >> about - those change - it's the internal controls (buttons, fields, >> menus, etc.). I've been working on RevZilla 2.1 (which is almost >> ready

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface?

Ken Ray wrote: No, it's not the colors and titlebar decorations that I'm talking about - those change - it's the internal controls (buttons, fields, menus, etc.). I've been working on RevZilla 2.1 (which is almost ready to be released, btw), and Mark and I were testing it under Kubuntu. Here's

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface?

On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:27:55 +0100, Peter wrote: > On my installation Rev IDE does change with the WM and with the WM > theme. To see the way it works, I started up Rev, brought up the > gnome theme manager, and changed themes. Rev changes - the color, > and also the decoration of the title

Non-Motif Linux Interface?

On my installation Rev IDE does change with the WM and with the WM theme. To see the way it works, I started up Rev, brought up the gnome theme manager, and changed themes. Rev changes - the color, and also the decoration of the title bar. It also changes in KDE, so if you want it in purple,

Non-Motif Linux Interface?

Is it possible to have Rev display using the currently installed theme or in any event NOT using Motif for the interface look and feel on Linux? I don't mean changing the "look and feel" setting to some other emulated implementation. The reason I ask is that Mark Wieder and I have been talking