Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface? - SOLVED!

2007-04-29 Thread Rishi Viner
On Friday 27 April 2007 05:22, Bill Marriott wrote: - My Revolution folder is on the desktop. I downloaded the tar.gz file there and simply extracted. I double-click revolution.x86 to run it. - I would put it into /opt, if that's where it's supposed to be, but Ubuntu tells me I don't have

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface? - SOLVED!

2007-04-27 Thread Bill Marriott
Ken, Thanks for the additional pointers. Here's what I had to do to get things to work: 1) I updated the revolution.sh script with the path to my Rev installation 2) I verified that all the files existed 3) When I double-clicked it and selected run (Ubuntu asks you if you want to display the

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface? - SOLVED!

2007-04-27 Thread Bill Marriott
I'm noticing that Ubuntu is crashing like crazy with Rev set up to use GTK. If I drag a tab control out, it's all corrupted. It isn't long till the whole thing locks up. Maybe it's best to stick with Motif until 2.9 is out? Bill Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface? - SOLVED!

2007-04-27 Thread Ken Ray
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:30:00 -0400, Bill Marriott wrote: I'm noticing that Ubuntu is crashing like crazy with Rev set up to use GTK. If I drag a tab control out, it's all corrupted. It isn't long till the whole thing locks up. Maybe it's best to stick with Motif until 2.9 is out? Don't

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface? - SOLVED!

2007-04-26 Thread Bill Marriott
Ok, I'm more than a little confused now. :) Of course, I don't know what I'm doing on Linux. - I'm using Ubuntu Edgy Eft, 6.10, under Parallels if that matters. - I made the recommended changes to the revolution.sh file in my Revolution-2.6.1 folder. I didn't notice any changes/effects; Rev

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface? - SOLVED!

2007-04-26 Thread Ken Ray
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:22:32 -0400, Bill Marriott wrote: - I'm using Ubuntu Edgy Eft, 6.10, under Parallels if that matters. It doesn't; I've done my testing in both Parallels and on its own PC - same results. - I made the recommended changes to the revolution.sh file in my

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface? - SOLVED!

2007-04-25 Thread Rishi Viner
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 15:59, Ken Ray wrote: Well yes, KDE would be using QT not GTK. A KDE only install may not have the GTK libraries at all, as far as I have seen. So what would the filenames be that I should point Rev's 'revolution.sh' exports to? I'm not sure. You could try

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface? - SOLVED!

2007-04-25 Thread chris bohnert
Ken, To my knowledge rev doesn't use libQT. It depends solely on the gtk libs. Which isn't really a big deal..but it does require the gtk libs be hanging around on your system to make it work correctly. Is it possible that Marks installation was an upgrade and yours was a clean install?

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface? - SOLVED!

2007-04-25 Thread Ken Ray
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:07:19 -0500, chris bohnert wrote: Ken, To my knowledge rev doesn't use libQT. It depends solely on the gtk libs. Which isn't really a big deal..but it does require the gtk libs be hanging around on your system to make it work correctly. Is it possible that Marks

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface? - SOLVED!

2007-04-25 Thread Mark Wieder
chris- Wednesday, April 25, 2007, 7:07:19 AM, you wrote: To my knowledge rev doesn't use libQT. It depends solely on the gtk libs. Which isn't really a big deal..but it does require the gtk libs be hanging around on your system to make it work correctly. Is it possible that Marks

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface? - SOLVED!

2007-04-24 Thread Ken Ray
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:47:15 -0600, chris bohnert wrote: You might try something like setting the following environment variables. I'm assuming Ubuntu puts the gtk libs in /usr/lib..but it might not. You might also compare Marks location for the libs to yours. REV_GDK_PATH

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface? - SOLVED!

2007-04-24 Thread Ken Ray
You can bet this is going on my Tips page! I'm going to check on Kubuntu, but I'll bet it's the same issue there as well... Well, *sort of*... on Kubuntu, there *is* a libgobject in /usr/lib, but there is NOT a libgdk or libgtk... are these supposed to be there? Or is there some other set of

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface? - SOLVED!

2007-04-24 Thread J. Landman Gay
Ken Ray wrote: It turns out that the 'revolution.sh' file included an 'export' for GDK_PATH and GTK_PATH, but NOT GOBJECT_PATH... and after adding that in, I got the current Ubuntu widget theme! Is this something the team should know about for the next Linux build? -- Jacqueline Landman Gay

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface? - SOLVED!

2007-04-24 Thread Ken Ray
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:12:20 -0500, J. Landman Gay wrote: Ken Ray wrote: It turns out that the 'revolution.sh' file included an 'export' for GDK_PATH and GTK_PATH, but NOT GOBJECT_PATH... and after adding that in, I got the current Ubuntu widget theme! Is this something the team should

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface? - SOLVED!

2007-04-24 Thread Rishi Viner
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 13:48, Ken Ray wrote: You can bet this is going on my Tips page! I'm going to check on Kubuntu, but I'll bet it's the same issue there as well... Well, *sort of*... on Kubuntu, there *is* a libgobject in /usr/lib, but there is NOT a libgdk or libgtk... are these

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface? - SOLVED!

2007-04-24 Thread Rishi Viner
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 14:12, J. Landman Gay wrote: Is this something the team should know about for the next Linux build? He He! It is like waiting for Christmas! ;) -- Rishi Australia ___ use-revolution mailing list

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface? - SOLVED!

2007-04-24 Thread Rishi Viner
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 13:30, Ken Ray wrote: It turns out that the 'revolution.sh' file included an 'export' for GDK_PATH and GTK_PATH, but NOT GOBJECT_PATH... and after adding that in, I got the current Ubuntu widget theme! Getting back to the differences between your widgets and Marks,

Re: Non-Motif Linux Interface? - SOLVED!

2007-04-24 Thread Ken Ray
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:42:28 +1000, Rishi Viner wrote: On Wednesday 25 April 2007 13:48, Ken Ray wrote: You can bet this is going on my Tips page! I'm going to check on Kubuntu, but I'll bet it's the same issue there as well... Well, *sort of*... on Kubuntu, there *is* a libgobject in