Hi Mark,
I voted on this bug using RevZilla.
BTW: how many times can one vote on a bug?
The option in RevZilla allows me to vote as many times as I want - with
the count option. :-)
Well, after reading the bug Description, I'm getting a little
disappointed with Rev Studio
for
Jan-
Sunday, April 2, 2006, 12:29:58 AM, you wrote:
The way I solve it right now, is to query the database
with:
SELECT * FROM TheTableName
and append TOP or LIMIT clauses for databases that
support this.
Then I can use revdb_columnnames to fetch the
information and then call
Jan-
Sunday, April 2, 2006, 12:29:58 AM, you wrote:
It is now available as bugzilla #3479 for your voting
pleasures.
Just sent five votes in that direction...
--
-Mark Wieder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
use-revolution mailing list
On Mar 31, 2006, at 11:04 PM, Jan Schenkel wrote:
6) Improve transaction support: right now you can
commit and rollback transactions, but you can't tell
the DBMS when the transaction starts? If possible,
allow nested transactions.
(You could call this 'revdb_starttransaction', and
make it a
On 4/1/06 7:16 PM, Trevor DeVore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
7) A little more exotic now: could you make the revdb
library run in its own thread, and allow callbacks,
similar to the socket communication model?
(That way we could just fire off a lengthy query and
the app UI remains responsive;
On Apr 1, 2006, at 11:25 AM, Ruslan Zasukhin wrote:
Actually Revolution should have Active Listbox if it still do not
have it.
Any threading will not help you if you want to browser 10 millions
table.
Active Listbox is an answer.
Agreed.
Then again, *any* multi-column listbox which is
On Apr 1, 2006, at 8:25 AM, Ruslan Zasukhin wrote:
Actually Revolution should have Active Listbox if it still do not
have it.
Any threading will not help you if you want to browser 10 millions
table.
Active Listbox is an answer.
Well, I want one of those then too :-)
--
Trevor DeVore
Jan-
Friday, March 31, 2006, 11:04:56 PM, you wrote:
4) On a similar note, add a 'revdb_fieldnames()'
function that returns a list of the fields in a table
for a given database connection
...as in revDatabaseColumnNames?
But basically amen to everything Jan said.
Jan - can you write up a
--- Mark Wieder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jan-
Friday, March 31, 2006, 11:04:56 PM, you wrote:
4) On a similar note, add a 'revdb_fieldnames()'
function that returns a list of the fields in a
table
for a given database connection
...as in revDatabaseColumnNames?
No,
--- Ruslan Zasukhin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Jan, Trevor,
Actually Revolution should have Active Listbox if it
still do not have it.
Any threading will not help you if you want to
browser 10 millions table.
Active Listbox is an answer.
--
Best regards,
Ruslan Zasukhin
Hi
All that is true. I built a test harness for the database
functions and MySQL comes through fine. If you don't
absolutely *need* odbc functionality you might consider going
with MySQL or SQLite. Or Valentina (I had to beat Ruslan to
the draw here...). If you have real clients with
ODBC has always SUCKED, and still sucks the big one. It's like
getting your data through a straw with a bunch of tape to plug the
leaks.
Don't blame RunRev for that.
I'm writing a complex MySQL based project with Rev and Trevor's externals.
In a word - it rocks!
sqb
--
stephen barncard
s a n
Incorporate Trevor's DB Library into RevDB.
I found working with RevDB incomprehensible. Nice to have the
primitives there, but I as a designer am more interested in writing
code for getting data in and out of a database, not having to keep
track of the cursor.
If you were to
Ahhh, you pose THE question for me to feast on :)
Lynn Fredricks wrote:
If you were to prioritize improvements to database access in Revolution, what
would you want?
You mention improvements. I would first request that you apply fixes to all
outstanding bugs related to the database libraries.
Lynn-
Friday, March 31, 2006, 8:40:19 AM, you wrote:
If you were to prioritize improvements to database access in Revolution,
what would you want?
g Well, it's hard to find fault with stephen's response, but also...
to put it in a nutshell, I think the functionality should match the
marketing
On 3/31/06 10:26 PM, Mark Wieder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you were to prioritize improvements to database access in Revolution,
what would you want?
g Well, it's hard to find fault with stephen's response, but also...
to put it in a nutshell, I think the functionality should match the
I would'nt say anything else Kevin and All. Thanks Stephen to let us
know about your experience of Trevor's DB lib ;-)
Best Regards,
Incorporate Trevor's DB Library into RevDB.
I found working with RevDB incomprehensible. Nice to have the
primitives there, but I as a designer am more
--- Lynn Fredricks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If you were to prioritize improvements to database
access in Revolution,
what would you want?
Best regards,
Lynn Fredricks
Worldwide Business Operations
Runtime Revolution, Ltd
Ooh, where shall I start? *grins as he cracks his
knuckles*
Ruslan-
Friday, March 31, 2006, 12:48:58 PM, you wrote:
Mark, I am not big expert of ODBC, but I remember that ODBC have few levels
of implementations. Some levels of ODBC do support only forward cursors.
This is issue of particular ODBC driver.
No, it isn't. The odbc dll that ships with
Hi all,
Im enjoying this forum immensely lots of pros with great advice and friendly
chatter.
Hence Im looking for help with the subject matter.
Im using Sarahs MySQLtest.rev to learn the required database connections,
but Im wanting to connect to MS SQL 2000 with an ODBC DSN name.
Ive
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
[snip]
Problem is, the select returns no data (when I know
there is data) and the Counter = -1 for Matching
records.
Ive tried with and without the semicolon ; in the
on mouseUp for the Select button.
Heres the select statement:
SELECT
Thursday, March 30, 2006, 9:34:50 AM, Jan wrote:
There's nothiong worng with your SELECT query ; the
g
problem is in the ODBC database driver not always
returning the correct record count. I've seen this
with Access and Progress databases as well.
See BZ #3291 for details about
Hi Mark,
I voted on this bug using RevZilla.
BTW: how many times can one vote on a bug?
The option in RevZilla allows me to vote as many times as I want with the
count option. #61514;
Well, after reading the bug Description, Im getting a little disappointed with
Rev Studio
for database
mfstuart-
Thursday, March 30, 2006, 4:19:59 PM, you wrote:
I voted on this bug using RevZilla.
BTW: how many times can one vote on a bug?
You're allowed five votes per bug.
Well, after reading the bug Description, Im getting a little disappointed
with Rev Studio
for database access. Im
24 matches
Mail list logo
