Re: OODB/Valentina-Revolution

On Friday, Dec 19, 2003, at 11:13 America/Denver, Dar Scott wrote: Valentina has some features I like that are called OO in its docs IIRC, though they might not be what you are looking for or what others call OODB. It has a nice, well-founded marriage of relational structure and pointers. Inte

Re: OODB/Valentina-Revolution

On Friday, Dec 19, 2003, at 11:25 America/Denver, Chuck Pelto wrote: On Friday, Dec 19, 2003, at 11:13 America/Denver, Dar Scott wrote: Valentina has some features I like that are called OO in its docs IIRC, though they might not be what you are looking for or what others call OODB. It has a n

Re: OODB/Valentina-Revolution

On Sunday, December 21, 2003, at 10:24 AM, Chuck Pelto wrote: I guess, by the silence from my earlier post (see above), that the likelihood of doing what I propose in the Revolution-Valentina environment is rather slim? Or maybe I'm just not explaining it correctly? What is the relationship b

Re: OODB/Valentina-Revolution

Or maybe I'm just not explaining it correctly? Hi Chuck, I, for one, am unsure of your definition of OODB or the specific db structure you wish to support. I started a response to your original query re OODB; but trashed it because (a) I wasn't sure it was pertinent and (b) I could not find an

Re: OODB/Valentina-Revolution

On Sunday, Dec 21, 2003, at 12:40 America/Denver, Rob Cozens wrote: I, for one, am unsure of your definition of OODB or the specific db structure you wish to support. I started a response to your original query re OODB; but trashed it because (a) I wasn't sure it was pertinent and (b) I could

Re: OODB/Valentina-Revolution

Valentina is at and it looks interesting... Jim on 12/21/03 3:40 PM, Rob Cozens wrote: >> Or maybe I'm just not explaining it correctly? > > Hi Chuck, > > I, for one, am unsure of your definition of OODB or the specific db > structure you wish to suppor