On Feb 4, 2009, Richmond Mathewson wrote:
Possibly this message should be subtitled "Richmond Eats Crow."
Alternatively, I might be pointing out something that should have
been pointed out a long time ago . . .
Just put a stack together:
"ODD BUTTONS.rev" - revOnline under 'Richmond'
that
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Richmond Mathewson wrote:
> I also suppose, the good folks
> who make ButtonGadget would not be overly pleased if I took their
> stuff apart (i.e. reverse engineering) and ripped them off - quite apart
> from an awkward feeling that I have that may not be terribly m
On Wed Feb 4, 2009, Richmond Mathewson geradamas at yahoo.com wrote:
J. Landman Gay wrote:
"Just draw the shape you want with it."
Um, I've never been a great fan of the graphic tools contained within
Runtime Revolution.
It is really not too difficult to use the polygon tool to place
irre
Chipp Walters wrote:
"ButtonGadget has been making different shaped buttons for Rev for years."
Yes, I know; but I have no money! And, I am on a never-ending
quest for a cheap (preferably FREE) solution to what I regard as
everyday problems in Runtime Revolution. I also suppose, the good folks
wh
ButtonGadget has been making different shaped buttons for Rev for years.
www.buttongadget.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http:/
Richmond Mathewson wrote:
J. Landman Gay wrote:
"just use an opaque graphic object with the appropriate points set."
Can you explain what you mean by "with the appropriate points set" ?
I just meant that the graphic needs to be the correct shape for what it
should represent (the "points" of
J. Landman Gay wrote:
"just use an opaque graphic object with the appropriate points set."
Can you explain what you mean by "with the appropriate points set" ?
sincerely, Richmond Mathewson.
A Thorn in the flesh is better than a fail
Richmond Mathewson wrote:
One criticism that has been levelled against Runtime Revolution
is that it seems to provide no way of making non-rectangular buttons.
"Buttons" don't have to be buttons; any object can act like a button and
have a script. In Rev, if you want non-rectangular buttons, j
;>
>> Now, 12 years later, it might not be a bad idea if we could catch
>> up with MacroMedia (well, at least in this respect) and find a way to
>> produce odd-shaped buttons . . .
>>
>> Thoughts, Solutions (um?), Ideas . . .
>>
>
> Richmond,
>
> I
Possibly this message should be subtitled "Richmond Eats Crow."
Alternatively, I might be pointing out something that should have
been pointed out a long time ago . . .
Just put a stack together:
"ODD BUTTONS.rev" - revOnline under 'Richmond'
that shows that when either PNG or GIF images with
: and, guess what, they were
country-shaped buttons. That was in 1996 (!!), and the CD
had been built with MacroMedia Authorware.
Now, 12 years later, it might not be a bad idea if we could catch
up with MacroMedia (well, at least in this respect) and find a way to
produce odd-shaped bu
Erm, thinking on my feet . . .
This gets me wondering:
http://www.mcli.dist.maricopa.edu/director/faq/sect/5_9.html
Oh, well, going down the road to buy a dishwasher . . . and then
start cutting holes in the plasterboard for the pipes: using,
oddly enough, a machine that makes round holes (i.e.
as in 1996 (!!), and the CD
had been built with MacroMedia Authorware.
Now, 12 years later, it might not be a bad idea if we could catch
up with MacroMedia (well, at least in this respect) and find a way to
produce odd-shaped buttons . . .
Thoughts, Solutions (um?), Ideas . . .
sinc
13 matches
Mail list logo
