And if I do this, is there a way to get the file inside the OS X
bundle?
Yes, right-click (control-click) on the application and choose "Show
Package Contents" from the popup menu.
Thanks for the replies. I knew I'd seen something like that. I tried
both option and command, but only think of
I'm using RR2.1.2 on OSX, and would like to avoid using the standalone
builder, as it takes 30 to 40 minutes doing something with a particular
substack.
If you've turned off the property-checking options in the App Builder
and this persists I'd call it a bug.
The actual mechanics of merging the e
Dave,
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 23:27:32 -0700
From: David Squance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Of standalones, bundles and files
I'm using RR2.1.2 on OSX, and would like to avoid using the standalone
builder, as it takes 30 to 40 minutes doing something with a particular
substack.
I'm using RR2.1.2 on OSX, and would like to avoid using the standalone
builder, as it takes 30 to 40 minutes doing something with a
particular substack. Is there a reason why I shouldn't just build the
splashscreen stack and put the 'real' rev file in the same folder and
avoid having it in the
I'm using RR2.1.2 on OSX, and would like to avoid using the standalone
builder, as it takes 30 to 40 minutes doing something with a particular
substack. Is there a reason why I shouldn't just build the
splashscreen stack and put the 'real' rev file in the same folder and
avoid having it in the