Re: Of standalones, bundles and files

2005-01-28 Thread David Squance
And if I do this, is there a way to get the file inside the OS X bundle? Yes, right-click (control-click) on the application and choose "Show Package Contents" from the popup menu. Thanks for the replies. I knew I'd seen something like that. I tried both option and command, but only think of

Re: Of standalones, bundles and files

2005-01-28 Thread Richard Gaskin
I'm using RR2.1.2 on OSX, and would like to avoid using the standalone builder, as it takes 30 to 40 minutes doing something with a particular substack. If you've turned off the property-checking options in the App Builder and this persists I'd call it a bug. The actual mechanics of merging the e

RE: Of standalones, bundles and files

2005-01-28 Thread Joel Guillod
Dave, Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 23:27:32 -0700 From: David Squance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Of standalones, bundles and files I'm using RR2.1.2 on OSX, and would like to avoid using the standalone builder, as it takes 30 to 40 minutes doing something with a particular substack.

Re: Of standalones, bundles and files

2005-01-27 Thread Sarah Reichelt
I'm using RR2.1.2 on OSX, and would like to avoid using the standalone builder, as it takes 30 to 40 minutes doing something with a particular substack. Is there a reason why I shouldn't just build the splashscreen stack and put the 'real' rev file in the same folder and avoid having it in the

Of standalones, bundles and files

2005-01-27 Thread David Squance
I'm using RR2.1.2 on OSX, and would like to avoid using the standalone builder, as it takes 30 to 40 minutes doing something with a particular substack. Is there a reason why I shouldn't just build the splashscreen stack and put the 'real' rev file in the same folder and avoid having it in the