On Aug 9, 2006, at 3:19 PM, Chipp Walters wrote:
I didn't see where Ian was trying to return an array. And I'm sorry
if I
missed your first iteration.
Oh, no, no. That was just a general comment I threw in just to show
off, I mean, to be helpful and to warn of possible problems.
Dar
_
Sorry,
I didn't see where Ian was trying to return an array. And I'm sorry if I
missed your first iteration.
best, Chipp
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subs
On Aug 9, 2006, at 1:48 PM, Chipp Walters wrote:
I'd thought
I'd reiterate the obvious. From the Docs:
get value("myFunction()",card 1 of stack "My Stack")
I thought I'd reiterate the less-than-obvious. This cannot return an
array. (BZ 669) (What's crazy is that if you leave out the
Hmmm,
Since Shao's mention of the value function received no response, I'd thought
I'd reiterate the obvious. From the Docs:
How do I call a custom function that's not in the message path?
You use the value function to call a function that's in the script of an
object that isn't in the message
On 09/08/06, Jim Ault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why not do the following?
insert the script of group analogClock into back
Now all the scripts are in the message path and you don't need 'send' or use
value, etc.
Ah! I have known about backscripts and frontscripts for some time but
never rea
On 8/8/06 1:58 PM, "Ian McKnight" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Dar - I revisited your suggestion for a custom command and made
> the handler work.
>
> A function seemed more appropriate to what I wanted to do as it
> returned a value (thats why I had thought of using the 'get' command
> to
On Aug 8, 2006, at 1:01 PM, Sean Shao wrote:
put value("randomTime(5,2)", group "analogClock")
There are some limitations to value() when working with sending
arrays and the result of arithmetic. At times arrays are simply
empty values and numbers have numberFormat applies with possible
On Aug 8, 2006, at 2:58 PM, Ian McKnight wrote:
Thanks Dar - I revisited your suggestion for a custom command and made
the handler work.
A function seemed more appropriate to what I wanted to do as it
returned a value (thats why I had thought of using the 'get' command
to get access to the RES
Hi
Thanks Dar - I revisited your suggestion for a custom command and made
the handler work.
A function seemed more appropriate to what I wanted to do as it
returned a value (thats why I had thought of using the 'get' command
to get access to the RESULT and it works) but it's as if the send
comm
On Aug 8, 2006, at 8:24 AM, Ian McKnight wrote:
get randomTime(5,2)
put the result
send "get randomTime(5,2)" to group "analogClock"
put the result
It seems Rev has a limited compiler when it comes to 'send'. I'm not
even sure what the meaning of 'get' would be in the above situation.
Take a look at the "value" function, it's like "send" for functions :-)
put value("randomTime(5,2)", group "analogClock")
_
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.c
On 8/8/06 7:24 AM, "Ian McKnight" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can anyone shed some light on this please?
> I could keep the function and calling handler together but would
> prefer to have all important scripts in one place.
why are you sending
"get randomTim(5,2)"
instead of
"randomTime(5,2)"
Hi
I have a function 'randonTime' which accepts two parameters, the first
specifies whether a time should be in 5, 10 15 etc minute intervals,
the second specifies 12 or 24 hour clock and returns a valid time in
the form hh:mm.
With the function handler in the same script as the calling handler
13 matches
Mail list logo
