Re: QT + SMIL = BAD COMBO

2007-12-19 Thread Chipp Walters
Not sure about the third link, but the first two links have a javascript popup which says: The information in this document is obsolete and should not be used for new development. ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please

Re: QT + SMIL = BAD COMBO

2007-12-19 Thread David Bovill
Yes - I wander if they work though - ie in terms of exporting to standalone QuickTime - Id put more money on them than SMIL. I am not sure how much the XML import engine and the corresponding media links (.qtl) are still used / part of any QuickTime future. It may be worth looking at on the

Re: QT + SMIL = BAD COMBO

2007-12-18 Thread David Bovill
Has anyone tried using the Quicktime XML format for the same purpose - I was thinking of giving it a go as it seems to be actually used - ie server side. These are the links I've looked at - though nothing coded yet in Rev: -

Re: QT + SMIL = BAD COMBO

2007-12-03 Thread Michael
Hi: Been working on a QuickTime editor recently. It's turning out nicely thanks to Trevor's fine Enhanced QT external. I'm creating it for WinXP and Vista. WinXP or Vista - Mac = BAD COMBO I decided to go ahead and use SMIL, one of those oft-touted but apparently seldom used XML standards,

Re: QT + SMIL = BAD COMBO

2007-12-03 Thread Chipp Walters
On Dec 3, 2007 4:51 PM, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In my opinion, SMIL isn't all that useful by itself. If you want editing features, try using Quicktime reference movie files. They are incredibly useful. Yep, that's what I ended up doing-- creating a QT ref file by scratch. But it's

Re: QT + SMIL = BAD COMBO

2007-12-01 Thread Andre Garzia
Chipp, I also went lost on that road before. I found that RealPlayer support for SMIL is better than apple, so people wanting to really use SMIL can move to RP or use a Flash Media Player, many support some SMIL. As for QT, it appears that there's a lot of half baked features. It's flash support

QT + SMIL = BAD COMBO

2007-12-01 Thread Richmond Mathewson
Andre Garzia wrote: bad bad apple. Yes, they are bad; but better than Microsoft. It is an awful pity that the computing world is dominated by only 2 platforms. However, Jahshaka is well worth a look { for video-editing } http://www.jahshaka.org/ and it has good price label! Have a look

RE: QT + SMIL = BAD COMBO

2007-12-01 Thread Lynn Fredricks
I also went lost on that road before. I found that RealPlayer support for SMIL is better than apple, so people wanting to really use SMIL can move to RP or use a Flash Media Player, many support some SMIL. I had the chance to meet with the Quicktime product manager at a recent Apple Event.

Re: QT + SMIL = BAD COMBO

2007-12-01 Thread Chipp Walters
It's also very sad that Apple QT can't export plain ole .mpg files. For some reason they won't license the code for the most used and prevalent video codec on the planet. Another case of Apple making all the rules. Bummer. -Chipp ___ use-revolution

QT + SMIL = BAD COMBO

2007-11-30 Thread Chipp Walters
Hey folks, Just thought I'd mention this so it's in the archives. Been working on a QuickTime editor recently. It's turning out nicely thanks to Trevor's fine Enhanced QT external. I'm creating it for WinXP and Vista. I decided to go ahead and use SMIL, one of those oft-touted but apparently