Re: JDBC instead of ODBC

2003-10-03 Thread Alex Rice
On Friday, October 3, 2003, at 01:01 PM, Todd Geist wrote: Is it particular hard to build this kind of driver? If you are programming in Java it's not hard, I would imagine. But JDBC makes no sense for Rev because it's not related to Java in any way. Alex Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Mindlube Sof

Re: JDBC instead of ODBC

2003-10-03 Thread Júlio César Ködel
AIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 5:31 PM Subject: Re: JDBC instead of ODBC > > On Friday, October 3, 2003, at 01:01 PM, Todd Geist wrote: > > Is it particular hard to build this kind of driver? > > If you are programming in Java it

Re: JDBC instead of ODBC

2003-10-03 Thread Alex Rice
On Friday, October 3, 2003, at 02:57 PM, Júlio César Ködel wrote: Those links that I passed in my messages are both for open source ODBC engines (for both Windows and Linux). I think would not be hard to make a MacOS X version, but, for MacOS, I don't know (therefore, I hate macs ;-] ) I once t

Re: JDBC instead of ODBC

2003-10-04 Thread Todd Geist
On 10/3/03 2:31 PM, "Alex Rice" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Friday, October 3, 2003, at 01:01 PM, Todd Geist wrote: >> Is it particular hard to build this kind of driver? > > If you are programming in Java it's not hard, I would imagine. > But JDBC makes no sense for Rev because it's not

Re: JDBC instead of ODBC

2003-10-04 Thread Alex Rice
On Saturday, October 4, 2003, at 11:49 AM, Todd Geist wrote: But what about all those database engines that can use JDBC? I know some of them are already supported by Rev but wouldn't it be nice to have a single method to connect to all those databases that didn't require setting up and config

Re: JDBC instead of ODBC

2003-10-04 Thread Pierre Sahores
Allo Friends, Under, at least, Linux, Java is between 200% and 600% slower than the RR 2.1 engine is. Use, at least the shell() + pipe option if you are not really aware (alike me, for yet) with the RevDB lib. I used it for years in production state critical apps (80% of writes, up to 250 connecti

Re: JDBC instead of ODBC

2003-10-04 Thread Bernard Devlin
>>But what about all those database engines that can use JDBC? Todd, maybe you are thinking of things in the converse. Are you seeing Rev stacks as databases, and asking for a JDBC driver so that people could connect to a stack from a Java application? That is the only sense in which the data

Re: JDBC instead of ODBC

2003-10-04 Thread Júlio César Ködel
developer wants the source code for some libs to FireBird? ;-) - Original Message - From: "Bernard Devlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 4:50 PM Subject: Re: JDBC instead of ODBC > >>But what about all those datab

Re: JDBC instead of ODBC

2003-10-04 Thread Bernard Devlin
>> Easier than a ODBC/JDBC/whateverDBC engine is a custom engine for a specific database. << Julio, If you are asking for native Rev drivers for Firebird (to go alongside the drivers that are provided for PostgreSQL, Oracle, etc), I suggested it to Runrev before, but have heard nothing for a

Re: JDBC instead of ODBC

2003-10-04 Thread Júlio César Ködel
for support to FB, don't you agree? ;-) - Original Message - From: "Bernard Devlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 6:33 PM Subject: Re: JDBC instead of ODBC > >> > Easier than a ODBC/JDBC/w

Re: JDBC instead of ODBC

2003-10-04 Thread Todd Geist
On 10/4/03 12:26 PM, "Alex Rice" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturday, October 4, 2003, at 11:49 AM, Todd Geist wrote: > >> But what about all those database engines that can use JDBC? >> >> I know some of them are already supported by Rev but wouldn't it be >> nice to >> have a single meth

Re: JDBC instead of ODBC

2003-10-04 Thread Alex Rice
On Saturday, October 4, 2003, at 06:02 PM, Todd Geist wrote: There is a FileMaker Pro plug-in which can connect to any database that has JDBC access. I have used this plug-in to retrieve data from and edit data on Firebird, MySQL, and Postgres servers. There was very little difference in the

RE: JDBC instead of ODBC

2003-10-04 Thread Monte Goulding
> On Saturday, October 4, 2003, at 06:02 PM, Todd Geist wrote: > > > There is a FileMaker Pro plug-in which can connect to any database > > that has > > JDBC access. I have used this plug-in to retrieve data from and edit > > data > > on Firebird, MySQL, and Postgres servers. There was very litt

RE: JDBC instead of ODBC

2003-10-04 Thread Pierre Sahores
Le dim 05/10/2003 à 05:43, Monte Goulding a écrit : > > On Saturday, October 4, 2003, at 06:02 PM, Todd Geist wrote: > > > > > There is a FileMaker Pro plug-in which can connect to any database > > > that has > > > JDBC access. I have used this plug-in to retrieve data from and edit > > > data >

RE: JDBC instead of ODBC

2003-10-05 Thread Monte Goulding
> Le dim 05/10/2003 à 05:43, Monte Goulding a écrit : > > > On Saturday, October 4, 2003, at 06:02 PM, Todd Geist wrote: > > > > > > > There is a FileMaker Pro plug-in which can connect to any database > > > > that has > > > > JDBC access. I have used this plug-in to retrieve data > from and ed

RE: JDBC instead of ODBC

2003-10-05 Thread Pierre Sahores
Le dim 05/10/2003 à 09:24, Monte Goulding a écrit : > > Le dim 05/10/2003 à 05:43, Monte Goulding a écrit : > > > > On Saturday, October 4, 2003, at 06:02 PM, Todd Geist wrote: > > > > > > > > > There is a FileMaker Pro plug-in which can connect to any database > > > > > that has > > > > > JDBC ac

Re: JDBC instead of ODBC

2003-10-05 Thread Tuviah Snyder
>I'm all for any method to get the bountiful world of JDBC drivers can >be opened up to us. Certainly better than dealing with ODBC, on Win32 >platforms. ODBC is standard on Win32 platforms, and OSX ships with an ODBC manager. So it's just a matter of getting the ODBC drivers from the vendor. If yo

Re: JDBC instead of ODBC

2003-10-05 Thread Alex Rice
On Sunday, October 5, 2003, at 05:08 AM, Tuviah Snyder wrote: I'm all for any method to get the bountiful world of JDBC drivers can be opened up to us. Certainly better than dealing with ODBC, on Win32 platforms. ODBC is standard on Win32 platforms, and OSX ships with an ODBC manager. So it's ju

Re: JDBC instead of ODBC

2003-10-05 Thread Júlio César Ködel
PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 4:24 AM Subject: RE: JDBC instead of ODBC > > > Le dim 05/10/2003 à 05:43, Monte Goulding a écrit : > > > > On Saturday, October 4, 2003, at 06:02 PM, Todd Geist wrote: > > > > >

Re: JDBC instead of ODBC

2003-10-05 Thread Pierre Sahores
ore could we want??? Access and MSSQL Server? (This > could be true to Macs and Windows, but I doubt about someone in Linux make > some Microsoft thing, he he he) > > - Original Message - > From: "Tuviah Snyder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: JDBC instead of ODBC

2003-10-05 Thread Júlio César Ködel
> I would for my own say : before them and many others alike, Sybase ASE > 12.5 or IBM DB2, and along the other best ACID compliant SQL server > available for free : the usefull and unbreakable PostgreSQL... > PostgreSQL... Did you install it on Windows? How many days did you get to do this task? A

Re: JDBC instead of ODBC

2003-10-05 Thread Pierre Sahores
Le dim 05/10/2003 à 21:56, Júlio César Ködel a écrit : > > I would for my own say : before them and many others alike, Sybase ASE > > 12.5 or IBM DB2, and along the other best ACID compliant SQL server > > available for free : the usefull and unbreakable PostgreSQL... > > > PostgreSQL... Did you in

Re: JDBC instead of ODBC

2003-10-06 Thread Alex Rice
On Saturday, October 4, 2003, at 09:00 PM, Alex Rice wrote: I'm all for any method to get the bountiful world of JDBC drivers can be opened up to us. Certainly better than dealing with ODBC, on Win32 platforms. Oops- I meant "[JDBC is] Certainly better than dealing with ODBC, on *non* Win32 pl

Re: Drivers for Firebird/Interbase (Was Re: JDBC instead of ODBC)

2003-10-05 Thread Júlio César Ködel
that we have to make such transations). - Original Message - From: "Bernard Devlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2003 2:41 PM Subject: Drivers for Firebird/Interbase (Was Re: JDBC instead of ODBC) > Julio > > >&

re: Drivers for Firebird/Interbase (Was Re: JDBC instead of ODBC)

2003-10-05 Thread Tuviah Snyder
>Nevertheless, if there was only one external database for which Runrev >provided native Rev drivers, it should be Interbase/Firebird. So go file an enhancement request and everyone who thinks we should support FireBird or whatever other database (SQLLite, OpenBase, FrontBase, ect) please vote for

re: Drivers for Firebird/Interbase (Was Re: JDBC instead of ODBC)

2003-10-05 Thread Bernard Devlin
>>Nevertheless, if there was only one external database for which Runrev >>provided native Rev drivers, it should be Interbase/Firebird. >So go file an enhancement request Tuviah, If I'm not mistaken, I did this about 12 months ago. I remember Geoff Canyon writing to me for further details.

re: Drivers for Firebird/Interbase (Was Re: JDBC instead of ODBC)

2003-10-05 Thread Jeanne A. E. DeVoto
At 9:11 PM +0100 10/4/2003, Bernard Devlin wrote: Where does one view (and vote for) these feature requests? In Bugzilla: . To file an enhancement request, click "Submit a new bug report or enhancement request", and set the Severity ratin

re: Drivers for Firebird/Interbase (Was Re: JDBC instead of ODBC)

2003-10-05 Thread Bernard Devlin
>>Where does one view (and vote for) these feature requests? >In Bugzilla: >. To file >an enhancement request, click "Submit a new bug report or enhancement >request", and set the Severity rating to "Enhancement". >(You'll need to sign

re: Drivers for Firebird/Interbase (Was Re: JDBC instead of ODBC)

2003-10-05 Thread Jeanne A. E. DeVoto
At 1:07 AM +0100 10/5/2003, Bernard Devlin wrote: Kinda weird, but thanks Jeanne :-) I wouldn't have thought to submit an enhancement request through a bug-reporting facility. And I must have missed the advisory that non-Enterprise users could submit bugs (I remember emailing Heather last year th