Re: macworld - Rev 3.0 coming Monday

Down the bottom - the unresponsive one is the "result" 2008/9/12 Paul Gabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I tried that, but the thumbs up symbol was unresponsive (as far as I can > tell). > > Paul Gabel > > --- > > On Sep 12, 2008, at 3:02 AM, Jim Sims wrote: > > >> http://www.macworld.com/ar

Re: macworld - Rev 3.0 coming Monday

I tried that, but the thumbs up symbol was unresponsive (as far as I can tell). Paul Gabel --- On Sep 12, 2008, at 3:02 AM, Jim Sims wrote: http://www.macworld.com/article/135507/2008/09/revolution.html?lsrc=rss_main Click the thumb's up symbol. sims

Re: macworld - Rev 3.0 coming Monday

Heather, thanks for the clarification. The 3.0 beta that I was using has expired, so I should download a release version? I didn't know there was one. I'll give it a go this PM. Joe Wilkins On Sep 12, 2008, at 7:32 AM, Heather Nagey wrote: Joe, your license is still good for 3.0, if you're

Re: macworld - Rev 3.0 coming Monday

Joe, your license is still good for 3.0, if you're having a problem getting it working please write to support. cheers Heather On 12 Sep 2008, at 12:20, Joe Lewis Wilkins wrote: When I purchased a new license last spring, I was under the impression that I would be entitled to all of the re

Re: macworld - Rev 3.0 coming Monday

LOL -- Indeed, looks like my brain needs some more debugging! make that 2007/2008 ;) "Mark Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Is this a bug in the date routines? :) > > Mark > > On 12 Sep 2008, at 13:06, Bill Marriott wrote: > >> If you purchased (what was then

Re: macworld - Rev 3.0 coming Monday

Is this a bug in the date routines? :) Mark On 12 Sep 2008, at 13:06, Bill Marriott wrote: If you purchased (what was then called) an update pack in Spring 2008 then the year would have run out, as we're now in late summer/autumn 2009. ___ use-re

Re: macworld - Rev 3.0 coming Monday

When you purchase a brand-new license, you get three months of updates. If you purchase what is now called a "software assurance" plan, you get all new versions released within 12 months/1 year from the day you purchased the pack. http://www.runrev.com/whats-new/new-lower-pricing/ If you purch

Re: macworld - Rev 3.0 coming Monday

When I purchased a new license last spring, I was under the impression that I would be entitled to all of the releases made this year. Is that NOT the case? Joe Wilkins On Sep 12, 2008, at 3:02 AM, Jim Sims wrote: http://www.macworld.com/article/135507/2008/09/revolution.html?lsrc=rss_main

Re: MacWorld

Great I'm there! ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

RE: MacWorld

Hi Mark, > > Guy and Mark W are organizing a dinner get together. > > Assuming that I'm the Mark W in question, I have formally > abdicated all responsibility for this and am now just in the > same boat as everyone else, waiting for Guy to decide on > when, where, and what. > Hopefully he'll c

Re: MacWorld

Lynn- Thursday, January 4, 2007, 3:49:24 PM, you wrote: > Guy and Mark W are organizing a dinner get together. Assuming that I'm the Mark W in question, I have formally abdicated all responsibility for this and am now just in the same boat as everyone else, waiting for Guy to decide on when, whe

Re: MacWorld

Dear Ray, Yes, Guy Jones is holding a Revolution dinner in conjunction with MacWorld SF, contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for details. Also, David Simpson of .comsolutions is representing Revolution at this booth, and will have some special offers to give out. It's well worth reading the fortnig

RE: MacWorld

> Are there any Revolution Events planned, formally or > informally, at the MacWorld show at the Moscone center in San > Francisco, CA next week? > > Are there Rev users attending who would like to get together? > Is there going to be a corporate presence there? Anyone > coordinating anything

OT: Re: MacWorld 2006 day 1

Charles- Wednesday, January 11, 2006, 3:58:56 PM, you wrote: > (great -- but how was Josh Redman?) Well, I went to the bus early in the day to check it out, since I had conflicting reports as to whether Josh would be on at 3 or 3:30. The folks staffing the table were happy to hand out freebies (

Re: MacWorld 2006 day 1

(great -- but how was Josh Redman?) On Jan 11, 2006, at 6:17 PM, Mark Wieder wrote: All- MacWorld is bigger this year than last. Not quite up to the glory days of old, but definitely bigger and better. And more people. I haven't seen any attendance figures from IDG, but subjectively it felt li

RE: MACWORLD

Royalty Free with Valentina Developer Network http://www.paradigmasoft.com > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Dan Shafer > Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 11:47 PM > To: How to use Revolution > Subject: Re: MAC

Re: MACWORLD -- but keep Monterey

Probably self-evident but I thought I'd jump in and point out that RunRev doesn't run Malta or Monterey and therefore there is no conflict in focusing on the product and being one of several sponsors to the conferences we're staging. On 1/5/06, Richard Gaskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Erik Hans

Re: MACWORLD

Yeah, this one fell through the cracks when I got sick and then stranded in the Sierra Foothills by weather. I'm open on Tuesday the 10th in the evening if someone wants to suggest an informal way for us to get together, but there's only a 50% chance I'll go at all since I've lost all this time.

Re: MACWORLD -- but keep Monterey

Erik Hansen wrote: --- Richard Gaskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: My hope is that RunRev does the same for a while, focusing on enhancing the product instead ... but keep Monterey. And Malta (coming up in early November). Conferences devoted to the product have a much greater value for a

Re: MACWORLD -- but keep Monterey

--- Richard Gaskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My hope is that RunRev does the same for a > while, focusing on enhancing > the product instead ... but keep Monterey. Erik Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.erikhansen.org __ Yaho

RE: MACWORLD

> Is there going to be any Runrev presence at MACWORLD this > year? I remember a while ago it was in the developer's area... Dan Shafer and I talked about getting a BOF room, but MacWorld organizers said the BOF rooms were booked from last summer. That's why I suggested leveraging the Mac Busines

Re: MACWORLD

Richard Gaskin wrote: Stephen Barncard wrote: Is there going to be any Runrev presence at MACWORLD this year? I remember a while ago it was in the developer's area... I haven't heard anything from them on this, but with any luck they'll be skipping this one. You're in luck then. They're s

Re: MACWORLD

Stephen Barncard wrote: Is there going to be any Runrev presence at MACWORLD this year? I remember a while ago it was in the developer's area... I haven't heard anything from them on this, but with any luck they'll be skipping this one. Don't get me wrong: Macworld is a lot of fun for us at

RE: Prograph (was Re: MacWorld part 2)

anuary 24, 2005 17:50 > To: How to use Revolution > Subject: Re: Prograph (was Re: MacWorld part 2) > > I developed 5 engines (21 titles) in Prograph CPX. I loved > Prograph, although I was disappointed when they finally > released it for Windows and CPX (the ABCs) didn&#

Re: Prograph (was Re: MacWorld part 2)

I developed 5 engines (21 titles) in Prograph CPX. I loved Prograph, although I was disappointed when they finally released it for Windows and CPX (the ABCs) didn't live up to the cross-platform promises (it took a lot of work to work around bugs on Windows). It seems their application classe

Re: MacWorld part 2

Roger, Ahhhyes! That was it. I really enjoyed using that tool almost as much as I enjoyed all the Amigas I owned. I don't mean to take this in another direction, but that OS was truly ahead of its time. I remember switching to the Mac after I felt like I was the last one to still use th

Re: Prograph (was Re: MacWorld part 2)

Thanks Dar. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 15, 2005, at 5:41 PM, Paul wrote: I see. I am re-writing my Buzz-o-sonic program (frequency analyzer for measuring impulse-excited materials) in LabVIEW. I have not done much with RunRev yet - except a diary app I hope to release when I get the time. A

Re: Prograph (was Re: MacWorld part 2)

On Jan 15, 2005, at 5:41 PM, Paul wrote: I see. I am re-writing my Buzz-o-sonic program (frequency analyzer for measuring impulse-excited materials) in LabVIEW. I have not done much with RunRev yet - except a diary app I hope to release when I get the time. Are there any user lists like this for

Re: Prograph (was Re: MacWorld part 2)

I see. I am re-writing my Buzz-o-sonic program (frequency analyzer for measuring impulse-excited materials) in LabVIEW. I have not done much with RunRev yet - except a diary app I hope to release when I get the time. Are there any user lists like this for LabVIEW? This user list is one of the b

Re: MacWorld part 2

I was reading a review of the Mac Faire in the NY Times. Speaking of the Mac Mini: "It's what Mac fans call a"headless Mac," and what Mr. Jobs call BYODKM--Bring Your Own Display, Keyboard and Mouse." Now who is "Mr. Jobs," I thought to myself. NY Times; always first class. Jim _

Re: MacWorld part 2

"I start to include/understand how a bundle of radish can sometimes contain the entire world." Jean Helium (painter... of bundles of radish but not only). Just a little correction to the first line of the previous post : please read 100 ko instead of 100 kb where needed. Gruss Gott, Klaus and

Re: Prograph (was Re: MacWorld part 2)

On Jan 15, 2005, at 1:43 PM, Paul wrote: Yes, I used Prograph on Windows. They did bring out new releases for the Mac which were an improvement. I didn't pay quite so much for CPX as I upgraded from the original version. Anyway, it's all history now. What sort of apps do you write in LabVIEW? Mo

Re: MacWorld part 2

Mark, Was it AmigaVision? I used that allot to make slideshows of weddings with music, animation, and it could be recorded to videotape easily with the Amiga's built-in TV-out capability. AmigaVision had drag & drop icons with programatic if-then structures and control capabilities. It was grea

Re: MacWorld part 2

Double Helix was a really nice tool. I used it a good bit as well. I think one of the reasons it worked better than lots of other graphical languages was its focus on database solutions. Dan On Jan 15, 2005, at 11:12 AM, Hannu Kokko wrote: Hi I used to develop relational datab ase applications a

Re: Prograph (was Re: MacWorld part 2)

Hi Dar: Yes, I used Prograph on Windows. They did bring out new releases for the Mac which were an improvement. I didn't pay quite so much for CPX as I upgraded from the original version. Anyway, it's all history now. What sort of apps do you write in LabVIEW? Cheers, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wro

Re: Prograph (was Re: MacWorld part 2)

On Jan 15, 2005, at 12:18 PM, Paul wrote: I just wanted to wrote in defense of Prograph CPX. I bought the Mac and Windows versions and have written successful apps in both. On Windows? I guess I was too early. I bought Prograph CPX for $599 because I wanted to make double-clickable apps. It got

Re: MacWorld part 2

James Richards wrote: There is a very real sense in which words can be viewed as icons, but complex icons which have certain possibilities of interrelationship built into them. This is probably hard to simulate in iconic programming -- |

Re: Prograph (was Re: MacWorld part 2)

Dear Dan and Dar: I just wanted to wrote in defense of Prograph CPX. I bought the Mac and Windows versions and have written successful apps in both. I have a business based on an app I wrote in Prograph CPX (Buzz-o-sonic, ). It was a great language and I too was sad to s

Re: MacWorld part 2

Hi I used to develop relational datab ase applications apps for company internal use with something called Double Helix in the 80's. It was completely iconic stuff, you only wrote the names of the things, everything else was an icon. Stuff worked, could be quite complex. Maintenance was a bit of a

Re: MacWorld part 2

Bon soir Pierre, Hello There, ... XTalk is still the onest development paradigm able to let us build a fourty different screens web app in less than 100 kb of code (PG backend management included)... and it's just why we are right in going head with Rev instead of any 10 years to old programming

Re: MacWorld part 2

Hello There, Le 15 janv. 05, à 16:24, James Richards a écrit : On 14 Jan, 2005, 2005 18:07:59 -0800, Richard Gaskin wrote: Part of Appleton's motivation for creating SuperCard was his feeling that textual programming, such as scripting, offered much greater expressiveness. Seems us scripters don't

Re: Prograph (was Re: MacWorld part 2)

I never saw the kind of buggy performance you describe here, Dar, but I do remember that the shift from simple Prograph to the far more complex set of class libraries in CPX caused a LOT of bugs and performance issues. Dan On Jan 15, 2005, at 8:22 AM, Dar Scott wrote: On Jan 14, 2005, at 6:45 P

Re: MacWorld part 2

On Jan 15, 2005, at 7:24 AM, James Richards wrote: There is a very real sense in which words can be viewed as icons, but complex icons which have certain possibilities of interrelationship built into them. This is probably hard to simulate in iconic programming I did a prototype of a commerc

Prograph (was Re: MacWorld part 2)

On Jan 14, 2005, at 6:45 PM, Dan Shafer wrote: As some of you may know, I wrote one of two books published on Prograph before that product/company essentially went belly-up. (Hmmm. I hope I don't have the decidedly unhelpful effect on *all* the companies whose products I write books about. heh h

Re: MacWorld part 2

There is a very real sense in which words can be viewed as icons, but complex icons which have certain possibilities of interrelationship built into them. This is probably hard to simulate in iconic programming Regards James On 14 Jan, 2005, 2005 18:07:59 -0800, Richard Gaskin wrote: Before wr

Re: MacWorld part 2

Yeah, I did a frustrating stint with iconic development as well. It was the early days of the Mac and some of you may remember a new icon-based driven database program called "Odesta Helix." It didn't take too long to figure out dragging icons around on a 512 x 342 resolution screen wasn't goin

Re: MacWorld part 2

Dan Shafer wrote: That said, the ultimate disappointment of Prograph was that even though it seemed like it ought to be a way to bring programming to the Inventive Users I know and love so well, alas, it embodies a very steep learning curve. Combined with the fact that screen size limitations ma

Re: MacWorld part 2

A friend of mine went to MacWorld, saw this thing, bought it, installed it, poked at it, and sent me a note. As some of you may know, I wrote one of two books published on Prograph before that product/company essentially went belly-up. (Hmmm. I hope I don't have the decidedly unhelpful effect o

Re: MacWorld article on Revolution

Hi Richard, > Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 10:51:19 -0800 > From: Richard Gaskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: MacWorld article on Revolution > Challenge for the community: get your professional products listed in the > Rev gallery at: > <http://www.runrev.com/R

Re: MacWorld article on Revolution

Klaus Major wrote: >> Naturally, there are drawbacks. The stand-alone apps you build in >> Revolution run more slowly than comparable RealBASIC or AppleScript >> Studio projects, and they take up a lot more space. > > RR slower than VB??? > More space??? > Outer space??? The latter. :) Actual p

Re: MacWorld article on Revolution

On Jan 28, 2004, at 11:32 AM, Jan Schenkel wrote: --- Dom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: and a superb TROLL: Just don't imagine that you'll be able to build the ambitious programs you can turn out with RealBasic and Xcode. I have to say, that was the one remark I didn't like ; granted, ther

Re: MacWorld article on Revolution

Dom wrote: > Trevor DeVore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > and a superb TROLL: > > > Just don't imagine that you'll be able to build the ambitious programs > you can turn out with RealBASIC and Xcode. > Andy's generally a ve

Re: MacWorld article on Revolution

Hi Jan, Trevor DeVore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: and a superb TROLL: Yo :-) Just don't imagine that you'll be able to build the ambitious programs you can turn out with RealBasic and Xcode. I have to say, that was the one remark I

Re: MacWorld article on Revolution

--- Dom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Trevor DeVore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > and a superb TROLL: > > > Just don't imagine that you'll be able to build the > ambitious programs > you can turn out with RealBasic and Xcode.

Re: MacWorld article on Revolution

Trevor DeVore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > and a superb TROLL: Just don't imagine that you'll be able to build the ambitious programs you can turn out with RealBasic and Xcode. -- Digital photos (nature, garden) : http://coold

Re: Macworld SF

On Nov 18, 2003, at 10:16 AM, Byron Turner wrote: Was the email intended for everyone? I didn't receive one It was sent to the Revolution announce list, just this morning. Alex Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Mindlube Software |

Re: Macworld SF

Was the email intended for everyone? I didn't receive one . . in any case, I saw something like what you describe on the MacWorld conference site but its too diffused. Its a session of multimedia development but its an overview of various tools rather than a focussed session on Revolution. F

Re: Macworld SF

On Nov 17, 2003, at 6:43 PM, Byron Turner wrote: I'm still debating about Macworld, but I'd definately go if there was a Revolution session. Anyone else want to join me in lobbying for this. I know its not too let to add sessions. In addition to Runrev's email they just now sent out about this

Re: MacWorld in NY (was: Re: Event in Italy)

On 2/7/02 7:50 pm, Chris Garaffa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, well, same question, but now about MacWorld in New York City... Anyone > representing Revolution/RunRev? Yes, we will be at that too - we will have a booth and there is a Birds of a Feather Session as Bill just mentioned. A more

Re: MacWorld in NY (was: Re: Event in Italy)

Already set up. I will be hosting a Birds of a Feather (BOF) session on Revolution at Macworld NY on Wednesday at 6pm. Click on the following link for details. http://www.macworldexpo.com/macworldexpo/v31/conference/track.cvn?id=6&tID=24 The BOFs are free to all Macworld attendees (any badge) so

Re: MacWorld in NY (was: Re: Event in Italy)

on 7/2/2002 2:50 PM, Chris Garaffa at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The same question about the APLLE Expo in Paris from the 12th to the 14th of September ? >>> >>> Yes, we will be there. > > OK, well, same question, but now about MacWorld in New York City... Anyone > representing Revoluti

Re: MacWorld

On Tuesday, June 11, 2002, at 05:19 PM, Howard Bornstein wrote: >> Three and a half mice in this month's MacWorld. Nice going RunRev!! >> >> The article, while short is quite complimentary. > > Could you post a reference to this article? I couldn't find any > reference > to it on the MacWorld

Re: MacWorld

>Three and a half mice in this month's MacWorld. Nice going RunRev!! > >The article, while short is quite complimentary. Could you post a reference to this article? I couldn't find any reference to it on the MacWorld site. Thanks, Howard Bornstein D E S I G N E Q www.des