What about having whatever script it is that processes the emails into the web pages 
simply automatically inserts "*4 random characters*" after any @ symbols that it sees. 
That makes it easy to see the real address, but the randomized "no spam" inserted into 
the middle makes it very hard to harvest an email address. Plus, @ symbols don't show 
up tht often in posts unless it's an email address.

Though, for off-list conversations, the email address is in the original email 
message, so it's not to hard to get to someone off list if you keep a couple  of days 
worth of list mail in your mail client.

>----- ------- Original Message ------- -----
>From: "Ken Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 09:14:08
>
>> It is perfectly reasonable to communicate with
>individuals
>> via the list.  If the RR list moderators could
>remove
>> e-mail addresses from the digests I belive they
>would do us
>> all a favour.
>
>Perhaps, but sometimes on-list conversations become
>off-list ones, and
>in order for someone to email someone off-list,
>they need to know what
>the person's email address is. If there is a direct
>connection between
>the email addresses on the list and an increase in
>spam, I'd agree with
>you, but until that is proven, I think it is
>beneficial to have the
>email addresses in the digest.
>
>Ken Ray
>Sons of Thunder Software
>Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Web Site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/ 
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>use-revolution mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolu
>tion
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to