Re: Reply to both (is RR too hard / easy?) and (is RR marketed to dev'rs only)

2008-06-09 Thread Judy Perry
Thanks, Phil. I'll definitely check it out. OTOH, just what I need -- another mail group ;-) Judy On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Phil Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Judy Perry wrote: >> >> I believe the official response was that they are open to anything we >> have to offer to them; anyo

Re: Reply to both (is RR too hard / easy?) and (is RR marketed to dev'rs only)

2008-06-09 Thread Phil Davis
Judy Perry wrote: I believe the official response was that they are open to anything we have to offer to them; anyone, please correct me if I am wrong. Judy Hi Judy, Was this the moment where someone mentioned Rev Interoperability Protocol ("RIP") and Richard (asleep at the wheel... I mea

Re: Reply to both (is RR too hard / easy?) and (is RR marketed to dev'rs only)

2008-06-09 Thread Judy Perry
I believe the official response was that they are open to anything we have to offer to them; anyone, please correct me if I am wrong. Judy On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 6:07 AM, william humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What did they say? Are we going to get some more example stacks shipping > with

Re: Reply to both (is RR too hard / easy?) and (is RR marketed to dev'rs only)

2008-06-09 Thread william humphrey
What did they say? Are we going to get some more example stacks shipping with RunRev? I think examples of a dozen or more catagories, the different databases, SOAP calls, all kinds of things... ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.c

Re: Reply to both (is RR too hard / easy?) and (is RR marketed to dev'rs only)

2008-06-08 Thread Judy Perry
You know, I think somebody (cough, hint, hint, ME!), mentioned this at RunRevLive'08... Judy On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 7:11 AM, william humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You raised an important point. You can't have too many example stacks > shipped with the application. I use an app called "Fa

Re: Reply to both (is RR too hard / easy?) and (is RR marketed to dev'rs only)

2008-06-07 Thread william humphrey
You raised an important point. You can't have too many example stacks shipped with the application. I use an app called "FastMailBase" which was made with RunRev. I'd loved to see something like this as an example stack it is an incredible use of RunRev with Valentina database. Check out their web

Re: Reply to both (is RR too hard / easy?) and (is RR marketed to dev'rs only)

2008-06-02 Thread Jan Schenkel
--- Peter Alcibiades <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Two thoughts. > > One, a big gap in Rev as a general purpose > environment seems to be getting > data out in a structured form. > > [snip] > > Could you do it in Quartam? Probably, but not in > Linux at the moment. > > I don't do this for

Reply to both (is RR too hard / easy?) and (is RR marketed to dev'rs only)

2008-05-31 Thread Peter Alcibiades
Two thoughts. One, a big gap in Rev as a general purpose environment seems to be getting data out in a structured form. Or maybe this is just personal ignorance in how to do it? If so, corrections would be welcome. You have lets say a tab separated file with data in it. This seems to be the

Reply to both (is RR too hard / easy?) and (is RR marketed to dev'rs only)

2008-05-29 Thread Mick Collins
Seems to me that these need to be answered together. Personally, I would love to see, say, a 6-month trial copy of Media bundled with certain computers. Has Apple or certain large-scale computer dealers been contacted about this sort of thing? I tell you, having HC bundled with the Macs r