--- On Thu, 11/12/09, Dom mcd...@free.fr wrote:
Jan Schenkel janschen...@yahoo.com wrote:
With revMedia 4.0 being free, why would we still need
a Player?
Agreed -- but with a caveat:
you talk of persons who are computer-litterate...
Think about a person, scared with computers, to
Hiya,
The Player makes distribution easier, as in there not being a need to
download and install revMedia in order to see the stacks: Slaps the
stacks onto a USB stick with the Player and can show it off to anyone
without having to get them to 'have to' install revMedia.
Cheers,
Luis.
for Revolution
http://www.quartam.com
=
As we grow older, we grow both wiser and more foolish at the same time. (La
Rochefoucauld)
--- On Thu, 11/5/09, Dom mcd...@free.fr wrote:
From: Dom mcd...@free.fr
Subject: Revolution Media 4.x and Revolution Player 3.x
To: use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Jan Schenkel wrote:
With revMedia 4.0 being free, why would we still need a Player?
The whole idea of giving revMedia away for free, is to let everyone share in
the fun - running stacks, deploying them in webpages and letting others take
them apart without the ability to password-protect your
Jan Schenkel janschen...@yahoo.com wrote:
With revMedia 4.0 being free, why would we still need a Player?
Agreed -- but with a caveat:
you talk of persons who are computer-litterate...
Think about a person, scared with computers, to which you give a
stack... and ?
a whole development package??
As a former user of Revolution Media 3.x, I used Revolution Player to
run stacks without launching the development environment...
I am wondering if I still can use the old Revolution Player (3.x) to run
stacks created with the new Revolution Media 4.x?
