Re: Revolution and the Web, feedback wanted, Part 2 of 3

2006-11-28 Thread Viktoras Didziulis
the most complicated part would be translation of scripts... Best wishes Viktoras ---Original Message--- From: Luis Date: 11/28/06 12:34:24 To: How to use Revolution Subject: Re: Revolution and the Web, feedback wanted, Part 2 of 3 Hiya, I still think we should piggy back

Re: Revolution and the Web, feedback wanted, Part 2 of 3

2006-11-28 Thread Andre Garzia
Luis, thanks again for your quick feedback. I do think we need XHTML instead of XML to fallback because some browsers will not be able to handle XML+CSS... there still people running things like netscape gold. Andre On Nov 28, 2006, at 8:28 AM, Luis wrote: Hiya, I still think we

Re: Revolution and the Web, feedback wanted, Part 2 of 3

2006-11-28 Thread Jan Schenkel
--- Viktoras Didziulis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Exactly! Once stacks are described in XML and CSS, the translation of stack layouts into a few other XML formats becomes nearly a trivial task. This could be both XHTML+CSS and SVG+CSS. Of course on the translated side, use of an

Re: Revolution and the Web, feedback wanted, Part 2 of 3

2006-11-28 Thread Mark Smith
I just took a look at it, and there's actually nothing there to see as yet. Maybe just another project started and then abandoned - we'll see. Best Mark On 28 Nov 2006, at 18:00, Jan Schenkel wrote: Well, I recently heard of a project called 'jsCard' - which aims to turn HyperTalk

Re: Revolution and the Web, feedback wanted, Part 2 of 3

2006-11-28 Thread Jan Schenkel
--- Mark Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 28 Nov 2006, at 18:00, Jan Schenkel wrote: Well, I recently heard of a project called 'jsCard' - which aims to turn HyperTalk scripts into Javascript. URL: http://www.creysoft.com/jscard/ Best regards, Jan Schenkel. I just took a

Re: Revolution and the Web, feedback wanted, Part 2 of 3

2006-11-28 Thread Mark Smith
Thanks, Jan, I couldn't get anywhere from the index page. It looks very interesting. Best, Mark On 28 Nov 2006, at 18:30, Jan Schenkel wrote: Take a look at the following URL: http://www.creysoft.com/jscard/stack.php?stack=1 Definitely a Work In Progress, but it fits with Andre's model

Re: Revolution and the Web, feedback wanted, Part 2 of 3

2006-11-28 Thread Chipp Walters
Wow! too cool! On 11/28/06, Jan Schenkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Take a look at the following URL: http://www.creysoft.com/jscard/stack.php?stack=1 Definitely a Work In Progress, but it fits with Andre's model of translating Rev stacks to web pages.

Revolution and the Web, feedback wanted, Part 2 of 3

2006-11-27 Thread Richard Gaskin
From Andre, cont.: First, let me begin by my all-wise-axiom People don't want Rev to run on the web, they want the development experience of xTalk and to be able to deploy for the web. Explaining, no one really want Rev on the web. Having a Revolution built application on an end user