--- Richard Gaskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> When you moved to Revolution, you said goodbye
> to 99.999% of stack corruption.
>
> Enjoy your new world. Don't work so hard. ;)
nostalgia for "compact stack":
it was theraputic.
=
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.erikhansen.org
_
Dar-
Another forth programmer! I, too, learned bottom-up programming that
way, more years ago than I want to think about, and it's served me
well over time. I still hesitate to write more code in a function than
will fit on one screen.
-Mark
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Monday, June 23, 2003, 7:52:28 AM,
On Monday, June 23, 2003, at 12:23 AM, dan johnson wrote:
For a really innovative and interesting use of color in programming,
check
colorForth
http://www.colorforth.com
Chuck Moore is still at it! I still work with some of his associates
and investors. Well, sometimes.
Way back in the previ
--snip--
Hmmm. With the new /* and */ comments, some doors open for interesting
documentation in scripts. We may want the script editor to not colorize lines
between such lines or to make that an option.
You have opened an whole new way for me to think about scripts.
Dar Scott
>
Fo
Sarah wrote:
>> Survey: How many of you use text styles in your code?
> Not me!
>>
>>> Yesterday my "potential corrupt stack paranoia" got the better of me
>>> and I
>>> spent a while doing a lot of "copy-paste" between the existing stack
>>> and a new
>>> one. I ended up with the same size, of
I can't imagine why somebody would want stylized text in the script
(except colors...they seem to be helpful).
Actually every now and then I like to pretty things up a bit and using bold
is a really good way to make something stand out. I haven't yet used a
different font.
I do have the "Remove
Dar Scott wrote:
>
> On Sunday, June 22, 2003, at 12:49 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
>
>> Survey: How many of you use text styles in your code?
>
> In the script? Only what Revolution provides.
I was referring just to scripts, and looking only at user-driven styles (as
opposed to colorizing whi
On Sunday, June 22, 2003, at 12:49 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Survey: How many of you use text styles in your code?
In the script? Only what Revolution provides.
In my stacks? I use "textiles" everywhere.
Dar Scott
___
use-revolution mailing list
[E
T. R. Ponn wrote:
> I do have the "Remove Revolution UI custom properties" checked. Is this what
> you're suggesting? What is the reason behind all the html?
Survey: How many of you use text styles in your code?
> Yesterday my "potential corrupt stack paranoia" got the better of me and I
> sp
Op 22-06-2003 om 12:02 -0400 meldde
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ons het volgende:
use-revolution digest, Vol 1 #1518 - 3 msgs
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 11:01:58 -0400
Subject: Re: Stack Size Bloat?
From: Marian Petrides <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
Using Jan Bleeker's "Export Scripts" stack
Where can I find this stack> ... it sounds quite useful.
TIA,
Marian
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Monte,
I do have the "Remove Revolution UI custom properties" checked. Is this
what you're suggesting? What is the reason behind all the html? I have
noticed when I open the stack with a text editor, there is a LOT of it...and
then farther into the file, it appears that all of my scripting
Erik,
Yes, as a matter of fact, I do...but it usually only amounts to a few hundred
bytes at most. I wouldn't have noticed them if I hadn't tried that "Export
Scripts" stack. When I see them, I delete them right away. Are these two
issues related somehow...maybe symptomatic of some bug?
Be
Howdy Tim
>
> I've been developing an app for a few months now and have noticed that
> the file size seems to be getting disproportionally larger than the
> objects and code I've been adding.
Rev keeps quite a number of custom properties in each object during
development. The largest one being a h
--- "T. R. Ponn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been developing an app for a few months
> now and have noticed that
> the file size seems to be getting
> disproportionally larger than the
> objects and code I've been adding. Here are
> some statistics on my
> environment and the
Oops...forgot to mentionthis is a stack...not a standalone.
T. R. Ponn wrote:
Hello,
I've been developing an app for a few months now and have noticed that
the file size seems to be getting disproportionally larger than the
objects and code I've been adding. Here are some statistics on my
Hello,
I've been developing an app for a few months now and have noticed that
the file size seems to be getting disproportionally larger than the
objects and code I've been adding. Here are some statistics on my
environment and the stack:
Mac OS 9.2.2
Rev 1.1.1
Current Stack File Size: 709,59
17 matches
Mail list logo
