Re: Stack Size and loc for 800 X 600 displays

2003-12-12 Thread Sannyasin Sivakatirswami
Aloha from Kauai, Scott: Thanks that makes sense... I've used xTalk all these years for in-house stuff and production work (big screens, cinema displays all around...) and am really way behind on these interface issues: OK, the other issue is initial screenloc. Even at 550, a vertical axis of

RE: Stack Size and loc for 800 X 600 displays

2003-12-12 Thread Chipp Walters
Revolution Subject: Re: Stack Size and loc for 800 X 600 displays Aloha from Kauai, Scott: Thanks that makes sense... I've used xTalk all these years for in-house stuff and production work (big screens, cinema displays all around...) and am really way behind on these interface issues: OK

Stack Size and loc for 800 X 600 displays

2003-12-11 Thread Sannyasin Sivakatirswami
I seem to have blundered in assumptions about what stack size will really work, practically speaking, on 800 X 600 displays. A stack size of 800 by 566 set to the screenloc on start up on OSX on a 800 X 600 display appears with it's title bar underneath the menu bar... and the bottom of the

Re: Stack Size and loc for 800 X 600 displays

2003-12-11 Thread Scott Rossi
On 12/11/03 9:47 PM, Sannyasin Sivakatirswami [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am looking for an optimum set of values that I can just use for everything. do we have to think about vertical toolbars on windows? if so, how many pixels is that off the max width of 800? i.e. should the optimum stack