Hi Ken. Thanks, however, upon trying this, the d**n thing still won't
die. I think I shall have to strip all (mainly) development functions
out of the main stack/splash screen and start again with the stand alone.
Let you know how things turn out with this evening's coding. So close,
so
On 10/27/06 9:08 AM, Mark MacKenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ken. Thanks, however, upon trying this, the d**n thing still won't
die.
What is your indicator that it hasn't quit? That it still shows up in the
process list? Also, what platform is this on?
Knowing that might help one of us
Well, time to fess up. I thought I had taken care of all of the simple,
obvious stuff. However, I found another handler with the exact same
coding for closing my application which I had missed and which was
actually trying to close the application. All my troubleshooting
efforts were
Hi. After a few month's work I am debugging the stand alone side of my
application. So far the app works really well and with a complacent
gleam in my mind's eye I click on the quit button of the main stack and
my application won't die! The program is in two parts really. There is
a Rev
Hi Mark
Well, it looks like you are doing a lot of unnecessary stuff. If you want to
'quit', all pendingMessages will terminate and all stacks will close
automatically. If I read you right you need you only need...
on closeStackRequest -- confirm whether to close the window
answer question
Hi Hugh,
On Windows, you need to cancel pending messages, close all stack,
stop externals and stop running handlers to make sure that your
application really quits.
Best,
Mark
--
Economy-x-Talk
Consultancy and Software Engineering
http://economy-x-talk.com
http://www.salery.biz
Get
On Oct 26, 2006, at 12:47 PM, Mark Schonewille wrote:
On Windows, you need to cancel pending messages, close all stack,
stop externals and stop running handlers to make sure that your
application really quits.
I understand cancel pending messages and close all stacks, but I'll a
little
@lists.runrev.com
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 14:31:01 EDT
To: use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Subject: Re: Standalone app as Frankensteinian Monster
Hi Mark
Well, it looks like you are doing a lot of unnecessary stuff. If you want to
'quit', all pendingMessages will terminate and all stacks
On Oct 26, 2006, at 2:34 PM, Mark MacKenzie wrote:
I tried stripping things down to this script. Then after that
wouldn't work
I inserted a script to cancel pending messages, still no good.
That leaves, in my mind, the question of running externals. Would
having an
opend connection to
Hello Devin. Not having much luck so far I stripped the close handler
to the following:
on closeStackRequest -- confirm whether to close the window
answer question Are you sure you want to quit the entire program?
with Yes or No
if it is Yes
then
quit
end if
end closeStackRequest
On 10/26/06 8:48 PM, Mark MacKenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Devin. Not having much luck so far I stripped the close handler
to the following:
on closeStackRequest -- confirm whether to close the window
answer question Are you sure you want to quit the entire program?
with Yes
11 matches
Mail list logo
