Re: System requirements on OS X?

On Dec 27, 2003, at 7:52 PM, kee nethery wrote: Are you using Aqua colored throbbing buttons? For some reason that sucks all available CPU cycles. Kee Nope - in fact, using no controls, just 6 image objects. Alex Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Mindlube Software | what a waste

Re: System requirements on OS X?

Are you using Aqua colored throbbing buttons? For some reason that sucks all available CPU cycles. Kee On Dec 27, 2003, at 12:39 PM, Alex Rice wrote: On Dec 27, 2003, at 11:05 AM, Geoff Canyon wrote: This doesn't address the underlying point, but you could import the image once, and then refer

Re: System requirements on OS X?

On Dec 27, 2003, at 11:05 AM, Geoff Canyon wrote: This doesn't address the underlying point, but you could import the image once, and then reference it by setting the icon of six buttons. Thanks- that does reduce the resource usage significantly. But yes the different between windows and os x is

Re: System requirements on OS X?

This doesn't address the underlying point, but you could import the image once, and then reference it by setting the icon of six buttons. regards, Geoff Canyon [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Dec 27, 2003, at 3:41 AM, Alex Rice wrote: I built a graphics test stack as a standalone. It just has 6 copies of

System requirements on OS X?

I built a graphics test stack as a standalone. It just has 6 copies of 1 animated gif image "imported as control". When I run the standalone: OS X Activity Monitor reports 30-50% of CPU and 60MB "Real Memory" used. Windows 2K Task Manager reports 10-18% of CPU and 8MB "Mem Usage". The Windows