Re: The RR programming model

2002-11-17 Thread Gerard Cote
14, 2002 10:33 PM Subject: Re: The RR programming model Rod, I don't know if I told you this previously, but I have entered a second master's degree program in instructional design and technology.. Anyway, they've approved as a final project for me to design a series of tools/tutorials

Re: The RR programming model

2002-11-15 Thread Wolfgang M. Bereuter
On Freitag, November 15, 2002, at 04:33 Uhr, Judy Perry wrote: I don't know if I told you this previously, but I have entered a second master's degree program in instructional design and technology.. Anyway, they've approved as a final project for me to design a series of tools/tutorials to

Re: The RR programming model

2002-11-15 Thread Mat Korica
Going back to the original question about the programming model, I tend to think of Rev as an object oriented language with preset objects. To talk in C++ speak for a moment, you can instantiate a button, give it data (name, size, color, custom properties etc), and give it methods (mouseUp,

The RR programming model

2002-11-14 Thread Simon Forster
Hi I've vaguely flirted with Revolution and gone through a couple of tutorials but I've never played with HyperCard or other stack based systems - and I don't understand the programming model which they follow. What is a stack? How do they fit in with more traditional programming languages?

Re: The RR programming model

2002-11-14 Thread Rod McCall
Hi Simon, At 10:19 14/11/2002 +, you wrote: Hi I've vaguely flirted with Revolution and gone through a couple of tutorials but I've never played with HyperCard or other stack based systems - and I don't understand the programming model which they follow. What is a stack? How do they fit

Re:The RR programming model

2002-11-14 Thread Fred_D_Yocum
Stacks and Messages paths --and yet that doesn't seem clear enough to me. Looking at the discussion on the list, it is frequently stressed if you want speed, you keep the data out of the stack-card-field paradym and put the information in a variable or an array. Another words if I was designing

Re: The RR programming model

2002-11-14 Thread Dar Scott
On Thursday, November 14, 2002, at 03:19 AM, Simon Forster wrote: I've vaguely flirted with Revolution and gone through a couple of tutorials but I've never played with HyperCard or other stack based systems - and I don't understand the programming model which they follow. What is a stack?

Re: The RR programming model

2002-11-14 Thread Rob Cozens
I've vaguely flirted with Revolution and gone through a couple of tutorials but I've never played with HyperCard or other stack based systems - and I don't understand the programming model which they follow. What is a stack? How do they fit in with more traditional programming languages? Hi

Re:The RR programming model

2002-11-14 Thread Jan Schenkel
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stacks and Messages paths --and yet that doesn't seem clear enough to me. Looking at the discussion on the list, it is frequently stressed if you want speed, you keep the data out of the stack-card-field paradym and put the information in a variable or an

Re: The RR programming model

2002-11-14 Thread Richard Gaskin
I've vaguely flirted with Revolution and gone through a couple of tutorials but I've never played with HyperCard or other stack based systems - and I don't understand the programming model which they follow. What is a stack? How do they fit in with more traditional programming languages? You

Re: The RR programming model

2002-11-14 Thread Troy Rollins
On 11/14/02 2:44 PM, Richard Gaskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You can think of a stack as the contents of a window, with a card being one of a nearly unlimited number of screens in that window. Each stack has one card when it's created, and you can create more cards with the create card

Re: The RR programming model

2002-11-14 Thread Judy Perry
Rod, I don't know if I told you this previously, but I have entered a second master's degree program in instructional design and technology.. Anyway, they've approved as a final project for me to design a series of tools/tutorials to help acclimate new users to Rev -- particularly non-technical

Re: The RR programming model

2002-11-14 Thread Judy Perry
Okay, I am apparently just too stupid to live. The previous message was intended for Rod. Please ignore me in my vast stupidity. :( Judy ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Re: The RR programming model

2002-11-14 Thread Ken Ray
, November 14, 2002 9:37 PM Subject: Re: The RR programming model Okay, I am apparently just too stupid to live. The previous message was intended for Rod. Please ignore me in my vast stupidity. :( Judy ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL

Re: The RR programming model

2002-11-14 Thread Sarah
Stacks and Messages paths --and yet that doesn't seem clear enough to me. Looking at the discussion on the list, it is frequently stressed if you want speed, you keep the data out of the stack-card-field paradym and put the information in a variable or an array. This is a good point but I

Re: The RR programming model

2002-11-14 Thread Simon Forster
Just to say thanks to everyone who responded - I have far better mental image of the RR paradigm. Not perfect you understand but far better, ATB Simon Forster ___ LDML Ltd, Office One, 16 Canham Road, London, W3 7SR, UK tel int=+44 70 9230