Dear Rodeo Transfert Dream Team,
Just waiting for its public announcement to license it ;-)
Kind Regards,
Pierre
Le 12 juil. 2010 à 06:38, Jerry Daniels a écrit :
Rodeo Transfer will not be included in the release version of Rodeo, but
become a separate, premium product with a real price
The Window is Closing
This leaves open a window of opportunity for those of you reading this post
who have not adopted Rodeo. You can obtain a license for $89 USD, but only
for a couple more weeks.
The price of Rodeo will rise as its capabilities increase--and this will
happen quicker
David,
In order to keep the pace up, we've had to focus on one platform for the
desktop client/editor--the Mac. Our original target for products created by
Rodeo was the iPad.
However...
We're discovering that we are really a webkit product...this desktop thing that
forces people to choose
However...
We're discovering that we are really a webkit product...
From the outside looking in, I tend to agree...
...and that's pretty much what prompted my question. ;)
Best regards,
David C.
___
use-revolution mailing list
Message: 29
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 23:38:02 -0500
From: Jerry Daniels jerry.dani...@me.com
Subject: [ANN] Translating your Rev stacks into web apps
To: How to Use Revolution use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Message-ID: 638131e5-5c56-4c31-b694-e3e96f5b3...@me.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset
All of this and more @ http://rodeoapps.com/what-is-rodeo
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Re-ANN-Translating-your-Rev-stacks-into-web-apps-tp2286222p2286227.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Hey, Jim!
Rodeo development and deployment requires no plugin of any sort now or in the
future.
Rodeo Transfer at the moment translates Rev UI objects into HTML/CSS. Rodeo web
apps are HTML/CSS/Javascript.
Rodeo tables are not plain text fields. The look and behave very much like Rev
development and deployment requires no plugin of any sort now or in
the future.
Rodeo Transfer at the moment translates Rev UI objects into HTML/CSS. Rodeo
web apps are HTML/CSS/Javascript.
Rodeo tables are not plain text fields. The look and behave very much like
Rev datagrids. They are single
://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Re-ANN-Translating-your-Rev-stacks-into-web-apps-tp2286222p2286383.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit
:
Hey, Jim!
Rodeo development and deployment requires no plugin of any sort now or in
the future.
Rodeo Transfer at the moment translates Rev UI objects into HTML/CSS. Rodeo
web apps are HTML/CSS/Javascript.
Rodeo tables are not plain text fields. The look and behave very much like
Rev
?
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Re-ANN-Translating-your-Rev-stacks-into-web-apps-tp2286222p2286383.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-revolution mailing
OK - I was not thinking of anything detailed, but in principle I would think
that a good number of people on this list researching how to get into web
app development and leverage their Revolution experience would research
these two alternatives, both have been covered in discussions on this list.
I'm amazed how quickly Rodeo is evolving.
Andrew K. wrote:
Now that the available object set is quite large I am going to have to
follow through on my rodeo purchase.
Jump on it!
It's good for all of us to encourage this kind of development.
Jim
with the features
you can leverage on the handheld devices?
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Re-ANN-Translating-your-Rev-stacks-into-web-apps-tp2286222p2286809.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
on the handheld devices?
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Re-ANN-Translating-your-Rev-stacks-into-web-apps-tp2286222p2286809.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
One more question! I don't own RunRev for Mac. Can I make stacks in windows
and transfer them from Mac?
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Re-ANN-Translating-your-Rev-stacks-into-web-apps-tp2286222p2286944.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing
in windows
and transfer them from Mac?
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Re-ANN-Translating-your-Rev-stacks-into-web-apps-tp2286222p2286944.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
in Tejas: It's time to saddle up, partner.
Videos:
Rodeo Transfer: http://rodeoapps.com/rodeo-transfer-rev-stacks-become-web-apps
Rodeo v1.3: http://rodeoapps.com/rodeo-v13-available-with-tables-check-boxes-r
Summit Keynotes: http://rodeoapps.com/tag/keynote
Best,
Jerry Daniels
Follow the Rodeo
Hi all And Chip...
I had a question regarding Chip's AltBrowser 2.0 external...
Is it possible to use the external with web sites such as Writely
(www.writely.com)? I attempted using the demo browser in the new 2.0 version
and was not successful. On the Windows version, it would kill Rev, and
Hi John,
I just tried this with writely and the altbrowser demo and was able to
login and create a new document on both the mac an pc. I'm using XP/OS
10.4.5 in rev 2.6.1.
I launched the demo..clicked launch browser on the first card and then
went directly to http://www.writely.com;.
Hi John,
It appears you've already received the answer, directly from Chris, the
developer of the altBrowser external.
Feel free to contact us directly with any questions about altBrowser at:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Chipp
John Patten wrote:
Hi all And Chip...
I had a question regarding Chip's
that theory. :-)
I haven't tried in 2.7 again, I was just happy that it worked!
Thanks!
---
--
Message: 9
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 12:23:29 -0600
From: chris bohnert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AltBrowser 2.0 Extension and Web 2.0 Web
John,
You can right your own handlers to manage popup windows, that's what the
callback is for.
Again, you can reach us directly at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
best,
Chipp
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url
Has the company ever spoken about any plans for using this - extremely
interesting - development platform for web app development?
Frank
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe,
AFAIK, the RunRev Team marketing and sales focus is mainly set on the
DreamCard and Rev Studio products lines. On the other hand, the
RunRev consulting and service departement can provide, in case of
special needs, professional grade development and solutions about
evry thing that can be
Topics:
3. Re: Rev vs. AJAX...Or Web-Aware Apps vs. Web Apps (Trevor
DeVore)
4. RE: Rev vs. AJAX...Or Web-Aware Apps vs. Web Apps (MisterX)
9. Re: Rev vs. AJAX...Or Web-Aware Apps vs. Web Apps (Mark Wieder)
10. Re: Rev vs. AJAX...Or Web-Aware Apps vs. Web Apps (Chipp
Walters)
11. Re
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005, Richard Gaskin wrote:
The languages we bring to the table can always be replaced. But can our
experience/talents/creativity?
Okay, Richard, you trolled me back into the gym.
I honestly was going to try to just sit back and let everybody think that
EITHER as a
Recently, Judy Perry wrote:
The more that we actively discourage 'thinking outside of the box' (or
even thinking at all), the more we damn ourselves to the present and its
limitations.
IMO, the use of templates/themes is not an attempt to discourage thinking
outside the box. It is an
Inspiring!
On 10/15/05 12:22 AM, Judy Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The more that we actively discourage 'thinking outside of the box' (or
even thinking at all), the more we damn ourselves to the present and its
limitations.
And then Scott countered with,
On 10/15/05 1:17 AM, Scott Rossi
On 10/15/05 1:17 AM, Scott Rossi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMO, the use of templates/themes is not an attempt to discourage thinking
outside the box. It is an attempt to illuminate the fact that there is, in
fact, a box present, which has certain properties and rules, and one must
learn the
15, 2005 6:32 PM
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: Re: Rev vs. AJAX...Or Web-Aware Apps vs. Web Apps
On 10/15/05 1:17 AM, Scott Rossi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMO, the use of templates/themes is not an attempt to discourage
thinking outside the box. It is an attempt to illuminate
And, I would agree IF it were demonstrable that this is what actually
happens. I just don't think it does. I don't see it happening among
either faculty OR students.
On a bit of a bummer midway through grading midterm exams. Sorry.
:-(
Judy
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005, Scott Rossi wrote:
IMO, the
Judy-
Saturday, October 15, 2005, 5:36:56 PM, you wrote:
And, I would agree IF it were demonstrable that this is what actually
happens. I just don't think it does. I don't see it happening among
either faculty OR students.
My observation is that Scott is one of those rare folks who are
Mark,
I don't doubt Scott's sincerity at all. Nor do I doubt Chipp's or Dan's
or ...
That's part of my argument: They're not the people likely to be seduced by
the persuasive technology.
I'm in agreement with Chipp re: the 'copying the Masters' philosophy:
except that Microsoft doesn't begin
Jacque-
Thursday, October 13, 2005, 10:13:10 PM, you wrote:
I use this:
http://flashblock.mozdev.org/
Works very well and leaves me in control.
*Very* interesting. Thanks for the pointer. And that way you won't
miss http://www.ninjai.com/
--
-Mark Wieder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
for cross-
platform software. Standalone apps are still:
* generally faster than Web apps
* not dependent upon a reasonably fast Internet connection
* not dependent on a server out there somewhere being up and running
and not overloaded
* better looking with better user experiences (at least
-
platform software. Standalone apps are still:
* generally faster than Web apps
* not dependent upon a reasonably fast Internet connection
* not dependent on a server out there somewhere being up and running
and not overloaded
* better looking with better user experiences (at least
Chipp Walters wrote:
Dan and I have been going around on this for awhile now privately.
Frankly, I'm not a real big AJAX fan. In fact, I think it's not much
more than the current flavor of the month.
Wow, that sounds a bit harsh:-) ! There are a few AJAX apps which seem
pretty cool. I in
Yeah, good additional points, Trevor.
Dan
On Oct 13, 2005, at 10:22 PM, Trevor DeVore wrote:
On Oct 13, 2005, at 1:54 PM, Dan Shafer wrote:
* generally faster than Web apps
* not dependent upon a reasonably fast Internet connection
* not dependent on a server out there somewhere being up
For myself, I don't see this as a vs as much as an also.
When I need to put an app inside of a browser window, I use whatever the
project requires to do that, and old-school tech like AJAX often gets
the job done well.
But for everything that lives outside of a browser window, for me it's
version of
rev quite stable have been happily using it the last few days for a
project, although i still get weird coloured syntax highlighting issues,
more so that ye ol metacard :)
regards
alex
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Today's Topics:
3. Re: Rev vs. AJAX...Or Web-Aware Apps vs. Web Apps
even a toy language like blitzmax is exciting because it offers
arcade-quality possibilties in the interface department (in slick opengl
3d etc) is cross-platform, early days yet but possible to do
server/cgi with talk to sqlite .. but it's ultimately nostalgic the
forum participants
how great this ajax is! Previously i almost ranted on some stuff where
ajax was not secure and overid some stuff i set in Firefox...
I decided to keep my day positive... but it comes back!!!
http://it.slashdot.org/it/05/10/14/126233.shtml?tid=172tid=95tid=220
cheers
Xavier
Dan-
Thursday, October 13, 2005, 1:54:38 PM, you wrote:
Another client for whom I've written three relatively large apps in
Rev has been advised by his new CEO to require me to rewrite them in
some more standard language or tool/environment. He may not listen to
the advice but he has
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wouldn't it be great if Rev Developers had a registry of
talent/capabilities?
Like this?:
http://support.runrev.com/resources/consultants.php
--
Richard Gaskin
Managing Editor, revJournal
___
Rev tips, tutorials
Wouldn't it be great if Rev Developers had a registry of
talent/capabilities?
Like this?:
http://support.runrev.com/resources/consultants.php
--
Richard Gaskin
Managing Editor, revJournal
blush Yeah... Like that. /blush ;-p
Roger Eller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- but Rev is just much faster and cheaper to develop in -
plus of course
On 13 Oct 2005, at 22:54, Dan Shafer wrote:
* generally faster than Web apps
* not dependent upon a reasonably fast Internet connection
* not dependent on a server out there somewhere being up and
running
What would be useful here would be to have an open source freelance
and company developer and resource - much more than just a few
individuals and companies listed on a web site and email list if
you need it fixed and Dan gets stomped well these guys can pick up
the pieces and send
octobre 2005 22:42:13 HAEC
À : How to use Revolution use-revolution@lists.runrev.com, Alex
Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc : Pierre Sahores [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Rép : Rev vs. AJAX...Or Web-Aware Apps vs. Web Apps
Hi Alex,
Perhaps would this link help, with all my apologies about my
froggy's
to doing Web apps in AJAX or some other open tool (my
current favorite being Laszlo - URL: http://www.laszlosystems.com and
http://www.openlaszlo.org) is that *all* of the issues of cross-
platform delivery just go away. Yeah, there are still some minor
inconveniences with cross-browser issues
Dan Shafer wrote:
Laszlo spits out SWF files that play in
any Flash player from 5.0 forward, and because of the Flash technology
are guaranteed to work in any browser (since over 99% of them have
Flash plug-ins already installed).
Well, except for those of us who remove Flash because
I guess I've gotten to a place where I ignore (as in don't even see)
those animated ads any more. They don't bother me enough to miss the
Flash content that i do like.
But your point is well taken as well. Flash isn't 100% ubiquitous.
Neither, for that matter, is JavaScript.
On Oct 13,
Dan-
Thursday, October 13, 2005, 1:54:38 PM, you wrote:
Another client for whom I've written three relatively large apps in
Rev has been advised by his new CEO to require me to rewrite them in
some more standard language or tool/environment. He may not listen to
the advice but he has raised
I agree 100%. Unless, of course, I'm the sole source.
Dan
On Oct 13, 2005, at 4:17 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Back when I was doing hardware stuff, our one strict rule was never
design a circuit with single-source parts. If your sole supplier gets
stomped on by a dinosaur you're SOL.
Dan Shafer wrote:
I guess I've gotten to a place where I ignore (as in don't even see)
those animated ads any more. They don't bother me enough to miss the
Flash content that i do like.
I use this:
http://flashblock.mozdev.org/
Works very well and leaves me in control.
--
Jacqueline
On Oct 13, 2005, at 1:54 PM, Dan Shafer wrote:
* generally faster than Web apps
* not dependent upon a reasonably fast Internet connection
* not dependent on a server out there somewhere being up and
running and not overloaded
* better looking with better user experiences (at least
On Behalf Of Dan Shafer
I agree 100%. Unless, of course, I'm the sole source.
Dan
On Oct 13, 2005, at 4:17 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Back when I was doing hardware stuff, our one strict rule
was never
design a circuit with single-source parts. If your sole
supplier gets
stomped
57 matches
Mail list logo
