Re: Why we have to use RR 1.1 together with 2.0...

2003-06-10 Thread Richard Gaskin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > There are a few thins missing from the property-inspector in version 2.0, > which makes me glad I still have a copy of 1.1 installed... > > Anybody who knows other things NOT possible in 2.0, feel free to > contribute... > (and not possible, I don¹t mean via coding...)

Why we have to use RR 1.1 together with 2.0...

2003-06-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There are a few thins missing from the property-inspector in version 2.0, which makes me glad I still have a copy of 1.1 installed... Anybody who knows other things NOT possible in 2.0, feel free to contribute... (and not possible, I don¹t mean via coding...) - When creating a menu, the buttons c