Hi Joe,
A standalone may be able to start up on Win 3.11 but will be rather
useless. A lot of features won't work. You should probably assume that
it won't work, unless you deliberately created your standalone for
3.11, not using any incompatible feature.
I believe that Win 95 is no
Hi Mark,
Thanks for your response; so a 3.0 RunRev stack may run OK on Windows
98 or later?
TIA,
Joe Wilkins
On Sep 29, 2008, at 12:33 AM, Mark Schonewille wrote:
Hi Joe,
A standalone may be able to start up on Win 3.11 but will be rather
useless. A lot of features won't work. You
Ooops! I meant this to go to the list.
This is a stack that will target young children, so it is quite
possible they will have older machines still running 95, but I think
most will have probably moved up to at least 98 since it was such a
wide spread success; so I'm going to try setting
How old a Windows OS will run RunRev stacks with Stack Runner? 95, 98,
2000, XP (of course), but earlier?
I'm trying to assemble system Requirements for a completed project.
It depends on the version of StackRunner you're using - take a look at the
bottom of the web page to tell you what
Thanks, Ken. That was pretty much what I had decided. Now I've got to
resolve the Classic issue using RR 2.6, I guess.
Joe Wilkins
On Sep 29, 2008, at 1:59 PM, Ken Ray wrote:
How old a Windows OS will run RunRev stacks with Stack Runner? 95,
98,
2000, XP (of course), but earlier?
I'm
Anyone who knows:
How old a Windows OS will run RunRev stacks with Stack Runner? 95, 98,
2000, XP (of course), but earlier?
I'm trying to assemble system Requirements for a completed project.
TIA,
Joe Wilkins
___
use-revolution mailing list
