Recently, Stephen Barncard wrote:
> I've found it's better to have one-word names for EVERYTHING as a
> general rule and use underscores and dashes to separate words. I do
> it by habit now.
Don't get in the habit of using dashes (as opposed to underscores) -- Rev
will often try evaluate a dash
I only use multiword names as keys when I want to have a multi-
dimensional array for a custom property. In essence I am just
substituting a space for a comma because it is much easier to read
the notation:
customPropArray[varX&comma&varY] vs customPropArray[varX&&varY]
The names are not
Hi Stepen,
Le 25 juil. 05 à 23:24, Stephen Barncard a écrit :
I've found it's better to have one-word names for EVERYTHING as a
general rule and use underscores and dashes to separate words. I do
it by habit now.
You are a good developer who always makes his work easier each day :-)
Richar
Dashes are dangerous too...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen
Barncard
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 5:24 PM
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: Re: array info request (new thread)
I've found it's better to have one-word
Stephen Barncard wrote:
I've found it's better to have one-word names for EVERYTHING as a
general rule and use underscores and dashes to separate words. I do it
Generally good advice, and easy to follow since Rev provides a label
property for most objects in addition to its name.
Extra bonu
I've found it's better to have one-word names for EVERYTHING as a
general rule and use underscores and dashes to separate words. I do
it by habit now.
Jonathan,
This is interesting about the 1-word names. I have been using
multiword names without any problems.
Dennis
Somewhere in the d
Jonathan,
I can see why I have not had a problem.
I only set the customPropertySet in order to create a set or play
with the keys.
I always set it back to empty immediately after (default)
Then I access the custom property only using array notation mySet
["this and that words"]
I continue to
ot;myProp"] into field "my field"
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lynch,
Jonathan
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 2:50 PM
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: RE: array info request (new thread)
I have never had a problem with mult
mber that it was not real obvious.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dennis
Brown
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 2:43 PM
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: Re: array info request (new thread)
Jonathan,
This is interesting about the 1-word names
Jonathan,
This is interesting about the 1-word names. I have been using
multiword names without any problems.
Do you recall exactly what the problem was?
Was it that the array did not work as advertized, or that you had
problems with sorting keys or making the key unique?
Of course multi
On Jul 25, 2005, at 12:00 PM, keith wrote:
Sometime around 25/7/05 (at 01:19 -0400) Thomas McGrath III said:
I always learn best by example.
Absolutely!
Speaking of learning by example (or any other method, I'm not
fussy! ;-) is there anything around that could help me get my head
aroun
11 matches
Mail list logo
