Re: does setting the angle of an image make its size unchangeable?

2007-10-04 Thread Josh Mellicker
Can anyone tell me if this is a bug that should be bugzilla'd? create a stack add an image set the filename of the image verify that it resizes as expected (change width, height or rect, with property inspector or script) now: set the angle of the image to 270 try to resize the image what

Re: does setting the angle of an image make its size unchangeable?

2007-10-04 Thread Eric Chatonet
Hi Josh, Le 4 oct. 07 à 11:20, Josh Mellicker a écrit : Can anyone tell me if this is a bug that should be bugzilla'd? I don't think so: From the docs: Unlike the rotate command, the angle property affects only the screen display of the image, not the actual picture data in it. In

Re: does setting the angle of an image make its size unchangeable?

2007-10-04 Thread Josh Mellicker
Eric, You have solved the problem! Brilliant! Thanks! On Oct 4, 2007, at 3:02 AM, Eric Chatonet wrote: Hi Josh, Le 4 oct. 07 à 11:20, Josh Mellicker a écrit : Can anyone tell me if this is a bug that should be bugzilla'd? I don't think so: From the docs: Unlike the rotate command, the

does setting the angle of an image make its size unchangeable?

2007-10-03 Thread Josh Mellicker
Setting the width, height or rect of an image works fine, unless the angle is set to something besides 0... in which case the size reverts to the formatted size, and is unchangeable in either the property inspector or by script... Is this normal? Can anyone confirm? (2.8.1, Intel OS X)