seriously, i had bad troubles and now do these
things:
* use long cluttery lines with lots of quoted
literals
as opposed to using cool Winkleresque functions
* set explicitVariables to true and
declare all variables inside each handler
* put anything like (me, the target, the last,
etc)
i
--- Richard Gaskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Howe many of you have found that error messages
> in Rev 2.2 do not appear
> to be related to the actual cause of script
> errors?
i thought it was an encryption.
Erik Hansen
=
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.erikhansen.org
On Tue, 08 Jun 2004 11:37:11 -0700, Richard Gaskin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Howe many of you have found that error messages in Rev 2.2 do not appear
to be related to the actual cause of script errors?
Me, certainly. With a bit of effort I could give specific examples.
I guess (it **is** just a
Me. OS X.3
Richard wrote:
Howe many of you have found that error messages in Rev 2.2 do not appear
to be related to the actual cause of script errors?
--
--
Michael J. Lew
Senior Lecturer
Department of Pharmacology
The University of Melbourne
Parkville 3010
Victoria
Australia
Phone +613 8344 8304
*
Hey Bernard -
Good to see you here.
I'm not sure what I want to hear - that I am the only one who has
experienced this radical bugginess, or that it is so widely experienced
that something will be done about it!
I believe that RR has demonstrated a willingness to listen to and act on
these issue
Hey Bernard -
Good to see you here.
I'm not sure what I want to hear - that I am the only one who has
experienced this radical bugginess, or that it is so widely experienced
that something will be done about it!
I believe that RR has demonstrated a willingness to listen to and act on
these issue
Me too. I've upgraded but continue to use 1.1.1 which is still an
awesome product IMHO
On Tuesday, June 8, 2004, at 04:57 PM, Ken Ray wrote:
Howe many of you have found that error messages in Rev 2.2 do
not appear
to be related to the actual cause of script errors?
Count me in as well...
Ken Ray
> Howe many of you have found that error messages in Rev 2.2 do
> not appear
> to be related to the actual cause of script errors?
Count me in as well...
Ken Ray
Sons of Thunder Software
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/
__
Count me in.
Judy
On Tue, 8 Jun 2004, Richard Gaskin wrote:
> Howe many of you have found that error messages in Rev 2.2 do not appear
> to be related to the actual cause of script errors?
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists
On Jun 8, 2004, at 1:25 PM, MisterX wrote:
put field "x" of cd 1 of stack y of me (of me is wrong...)
This is correct if in a script of a stack (which can be a mainstack).
It worked in a test script I just made.
However, there are some instances in which ' of me ' does not
work and I have not
After hardly using Rev in the past year, I spent the last four weeks or so
coding quite a few applications. I started off using 2.1.1 (the latest
version for which I have a license), but found error messages which
a) were unrelated to the eventual cause of the error, or
b) were resolved by sim
On Jun 8, 2004, at 11:37 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Howe many of you have found that error messages in Rev 2.2 do not
appear to be related to the actual cause of script errors?
Sometimes people don't like to be the first 10 to raise their hands.
So I will raise it here on this list as well.
--
ou be more specific?
cheers
Xavier
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Richard
> Gaskin
> Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 20:37
> To: How to use Revolution
> Subject: error message anomalies, anyone?
>
>
> Howe many
On Tuesday, June 8, 2004, at 11:37 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Howe many of you have found that error messages in Rev 2.2 do not
appear to be related to the actual cause of script errors?
This started happening to me after I tried out someone's stack that
downloaded extra stack information each ti
Richard Gaskin wrote:
Howe many of you have found that error messages in Rev 2.2 do not
appear to be related to the actual cause of script errors?
I certainly have.
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listin
Howe many of you have found that error messages in Rev 2.2 do not appear
to be related to the actual cause of script errors?
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Media Corporation
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FourthWorld.com
16 matches
Mail list logo
