Thinking it over, we could build a caching mechanism and only fall back to
stat if we don't have the id in our cache already.
Just what I was thinking.
PS: ls -l on my machine doesn't truncate the user name.
Cheers
Monte
___
use-revolution
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 2:07 AM, Jan Schenkel janschen...@yahoo.com wrote:
The reason to avoid a shell call to stat is simple: calling it for each
individual file in a big folder could prove an expensive operation, while a
simple mapping method should suffice to convert 501 to janschenkel when
--- On Tue, 8/17/10, Monte Goulding mo...@sweattechnologies.com wrote:
Thinking it over, we could build a caching mechanism
and only fall back to stat if we don't have the id in our
cache already.
Just what I was thinking.
PS: ls -l on my machine doesn't truncate the user name.
Loving your work Jan and Andre.
Cheers
Monte
On 18/08/2010, at 8:22 AM, Jan Schenkel wrote:
Hi Monte et al,
What I sent earlier is only a partial solution. At work I only had our
Solaris server to play with; but once I got home, I found things on MacOS X
to be more complicated.
See:
Hi
I'm wondering if there is a way to translate the numeric owner and group
returned in the detailed files into the actual names. At present I'm thinking
of parsing ls -l but if there's another way to do it I'd be interested to know.
Cheers
Monte___
)
--- On Tue, 8/17/10, Monte Goulding mo...@sweattechnologies.com wrote:
From: Monte Goulding mo...@sweattechnologies.com
Subject: file owner group names
To: How to use Revolution use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Date: Tuesday, August 17, 2010, 4:58 AM
Hi
I'm wondering if there is a way to translate
, we grow both wiser and more foolish at the same time.
(La Rochefoucauld)
--- On Tue, 8/17/10, Monte Goulding mo...@sweattechnologies.com wrote:
From: Monte Goulding mo...@sweattechnologies.com
Subject: file owner group names
To: How to use Revolution use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Hi Monte et al,
What I sent earlier is only a partial solution. At work I only had our Solaris
server to play with; but once I got home, I found things on MacOS X to be more
complicated.
See: http://quartam.blogspot.com/2010/08/fun-with-detailed-files.html
Unfortunately we're not there yet for
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Jan Schenkel janschen...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi Monte et al,
What I sent earlier is only a partial solution. At work I only had our
Solaris server to play with; but once I got home, I found things on MacOS X
to be more complicated.
See:
--- On Tue, 8/17/10, Andre Garzia an...@andregarzia.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Jan
Schenkel janschen...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Hi Monte et al,
What I sent earlier is only a partial solution. At
work I only had our
Solaris server to play with; but once I got home, I
found
--- On Tue, 8/17/10, I wrote before my first mug of coffee:
--- On Tue, 8/17/10, Andre Garzia
an...@andregarzia.com
wrote:
Why not use shell(stat the file) to acquire
the
information?
Hi Andre,
It looks like stat has the advantage over ls -l when it
comes to displaying the
11 matches
Mail list logo
