On Nov 29, 2004, at 12:35 PM, Ivers, Doug E wrote:
Perhaps many of the best scriptors among us implement OOP concepts
(consciously or not). For example, custom properties might be a good
way to encapsulate data in a field (or other control). The key here
would be to write "get" and "set" scrip
Troy,
If you are accessing the Web trought, at least, a 1 Mb/s link (xDSL or
so), i can send you some more off-list...
Best, Pierre
Le 1 déc. 04, à 17:17, Troy Rollins a écrit :
On Dec 1, 2004, at 10:57 AM, Pierre Sahores wrote:
It's not a joke : Rev performances are in any case better than
Tomc
On Dec 1, 2004, at 10:57 AM, Pierre Sahores wrote:
It's not a joke : Rev performances are in any case better than
Tomcat/JSP ones and many more better than the JBoss/EJB2 ones, at
least with apps binded to PostgreSQL (Web and ERP) or QTSS (live and
on-dmand video streaming).
Pierre,
Do you have
Hello Xavier,
It's not a joke : Rev performances are in any case better than
Tomcat/JSP ones and many more better than the JBoss/EJB2 ones, at least
with apps binded to PostgreSQL (Web and ERP) or QTSS (live and on-dmand
video streaming).
- Support, if needed, of thousands of write-mode connect
TED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
01.12.2004 10:56
Please respond to How to use Revolution
To: How to use Revolution <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: (bcc: Xavier Bury/CLEARSTREAM/GDB)
Subject: Re: lessons from Java, OOP
..
Le 30 nov. 04, à 23:43, Richard Ga
Le 30 nov. 04, à 23:43, Richard Gaskin a écrit :
Theory aside, the practical benefits of OOP involve productivity,
through ease of maintenance and reuse. For all of the talk of
portable C++ objects over the years, few have materialized and very
few are cross-platform. That is, unless you adopt
On 11/30/04 4:17 PM, "Frank D. Engel, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If these features are of major importance to you, why don't you write
> your programs in Java?
>
> Rev is not Java.
True, but many of Rev's strengths came from looking at other programming
languages and adopting what "fit"
Ivers, Doug E wrote:
> I'm finishing up my first semester of Java, and it has given
> me a new perspective on programming. I suspect that some OOP
> concepts can be incorporated without changing the language but
> through programming style.
Amen, brother. So nice to hear that. Most folks fond of
If these features are of major importance to you, why don't you write
your programs in Java?
Rev is not Java. They are two different languages, with two different
programming models. What works well for Java and what works well for
Rev are often completely different techniques.
Meanwhile, y
I'm finishing up my first semester of Java, and it has given me a new
perspective on programming. I suspect that some OOP concepts can be
incorporated without changing the language but through programming style.
Perhaps many of the best scriptors among us implement OOP concepts (consciously
or
10 matches
Mail list logo
