RE: problem waiting - spellchecker

2005-11-21 Thread xavier . bury
] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 19:28 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; How to use Revolution Subject: Re: problem waiting - spellchecker On 1 Sep 2005, at 17:20, MisterX wrote: repeat... ... put wait into xosdictionary[current] --put the waitdepth -- always 1

RE: problem waiting - spellchecker

2005-09-02 Thread xbury . cs
] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 19:28 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; How to use Revolution Subject: Re: problem waiting - spellchecker On 1 Sep 2005, at 17:20, MisterX wrote: repeat... ... put wait into xosdictionary[current] --put the waitdepth -- always 1

Re: problem waiting - spellchecker

2005-09-01 Thread xbury . cs
Hi everyone I've advanced quite a lot in the spell checker BUT the wait until [condition] with messages still gives me lots of troubles. It works usually the first time, maybe a second time, but it definitely locks up after 2-4 loops... By locking up, i mean that it doesn't seem to get

Re: problem waiting - spellchecker

2005-09-01 Thread David Burgun
Hi, Just at thought, but could you do something like this: In handler that you want to wait in: global gConditionFlag put false into gConditionFlag send CheckIfDone to this card in 10 ticks -- or a good value for the task global gConditionFlag on CheckIfDone if gConditionFlag = false then

Re: problem waiting - spellchecker

2005-09-01 Thread xbury . cs
Dave Interesting idea... Adding more pending messages ;) I'll give this a try later... Thanks... Xavier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/09/2005 14:11:09: Hi, Just at thought, but could you do something like this: In handler that you want to wait in: global gConditionFlag put

Re: problem waiting - spellchecker

2005-09-01 Thread Jim Lyons
On Sep 1, 2005, at 10:16 AM, MisterX wrote: I've advanced quite a lot in the spell checker BUT the wait until [condition] with messages still gives me lots of troubles. Just wondering, since it's being unpredictable, does it make any difference if you do: repeat until [condition] wait

RE: problem waiting - spellchecker

2005-09-01 Thread MisterX
@lists.runrev.com Subject: Re: problem waiting - spellchecker On Sep 1, 2005, at 10:16 AM, MisterX wrote: I've advanced quite a lot in the spell checker BUT the wait until [condition] with messages still gives me lots of troubles. Just wondering, since it's being unpredictable, does it make

RE: problem waiting - spellchecker

2005-09-01 Thread MisterX
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Burgun Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 14:11 To: How to use Revolution Subject: Re: problem waiting - spellchecker Hi, Just at thought, but could you do something like this: In handler that you want to wait in: global gConditionFlag put false

RE: problem waiting - spellchecker

2005-09-01 Thread Lynch, Jonathan
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MisterX Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 12:20 PM To: 'How to use Revolution' Subject: RE: problem waiting - spellchecker Dave, After some logical thoughts, this wouldn't work. Maybe it could... But is it realistic to make a simple process more complicated? repeat

Re: problem waiting - spellchecker

2005-09-01 Thread Dave Cragg
On 1 Sep 2005, at 17:20, MisterX wrote: repeat... ... put wait into xosdictionary[current] --put the waitdepth -- always 1 --if the waitdepth 2 then wait until xosdictionary[current] = continue with messages -- else skip... poor idea... --end if ... end repeat then, any

Re: problem waiting - spellchecker

2005-09-01 Thread Chipp Walters
X, Why don't you release Version 1 as a modal implementation, then release the non-modal version later? That's what I would do. -Chipp ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe

RE: problem waiting - spellchecker

2005-09-01 Thread MisterX
: Dave Cragg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 19:28 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; How to use Revolution Subject: Re: problem waiting - spellchecker On 1 Sep 2005, at 17:20, MisterX wrote: repeat... ... put wait into xosdictionary[current] --put

RE: problem waiting - spellchecker

2005-09-01 Thread MisterX
Of Chipp Walters Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 20:56 To: How to use Revolution Subject: Re: problem waiting - spellchecker X, Why don't you release Version 1 as a modal implementation, then release the non-modal version later? That's what I would do. -Chipp

Re: problem waiting - spellchecker

2005-08-30 Thread xbury . cs
All my code is modularized from the start... But i thought a loop was necessary. But B is how i went about it (still untested)... I just remember the last word i checked and continue... would wait... with messages block the gui too though? Thanks Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on

Re: problem waiting - spellchecker

2005-08-30 Thread Scott Rossi
Recently, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: would wait... with messages block the gui too though? Nope - you use with messages specifically to avoid any blocking. Try it in a test stack. Regards, Scott Rossi Creative Director Tactile Media, Multimedia Design - E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W:

Re: problem waiting - spellchecker

2005-08-30 Thread xbury . cs
wait with messages checkContinue doesn't compile wait with messages checkContinue causes an execution error. I quit MC, launch Rev to see the help about it... Ah, now i see the wait ... with ok, so i tried... wait 0 seconds with messages checkContinue still an error! Is there

Re: problem waiting - spellchecker

2005-08-30 Thread Brian Yennie
Xavier, Check the docs on this one, your syntax is wrong. You don't specify a message to be called when the wait is complete, your script just continues. [with messages] is an optional qualifier added on to the end of an otherwise ordinary wait command. wait until (someCondition is true)

Re: problem waiting - spellchecker

2005-08-30 Thread Scott Rossi
Recently, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there supposed to be a handler checkContinue or can i just call checkContinue from my other button to trigger the wait with to continue? Just check the value of a variable that is set by whatever controls/handlers cause your checking to be completed:

Re: problem waiting - spellchecker

2005-08-30 Thread xbury . cs
Superb!!! Thanks all for your great help!!! We got a spellchecker almost working... The revDocs need help here!!! It sure wasn't clear at all... wait [for] number [seconds | ticks | milliseconds] [with messages] doesn't imply that you can add a condition to wait for! Only time... Where i

Re: problem waiting - spellchecker

2005-08-30 Thread Dave Cragg
On 30 Aug 2005, at 08:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Superb!!! Thanks all for your great help!!! We got a spellchecker almost working... The revDocs need help here!!! It sure wasn't clear at all... wait [for] number [seconds | ticks | milliseconds] [with messages] doesn't imply that you can

Re: problem waiting - spellchecker

2005-08-30 Thread xbury . cs
im using 2.6... And it is missing the condition... cheers Xavier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 30/08/2005 10:21:16: On 30 Aug 2005, at 08:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Superb!!! Thanks all for your great help!!! We got a spellchecker almost working... The revDocs need help

problem waiting - spellchecker

2005-08-29 Thread MisterX
Hi everyone im working on this spellchecker (too) in a palette form. It should be able to work in any stack... Dictionary is ready, so is the SpellChecker's GUI. While everything is nearly ready, the stack makes a loop to parse all words and check each word and waits for a user input to decide

Re: problem waiting - spellchecker

2005-08-29 Thread Chipp Walters
did you try: wait with messages until checkdone? MisterX wrote: Hi everyone im working on this spellchecker (too) in a palette form. It should be able to work in any stack... Dictionary is ready, so is the SpellChecker's GUI. While everything is nearly ready, the stack makes a loop to parse

Re: problem waiting - spellchecker

2005-08-29 Thread Brian Yennie
Xavier, I would suggest either: a) use wait ... with messages or b) modularize the code such that your buttons can pick up where your code left off. IOW, there is no code running while waiting for a button to be pressed. Just save off your progress, and wait for the next click. Hope that