Re: use-revolution Digest, Vol 7, Issue 164

[Dr . John R . Vokey]

Ah.  Finally my point.  The difference is or was (with Metacard or 
hypercard or other Xtalks) that standalones *were not* the assumed end 
result.  Rather, the point is/was to produce *stacks*.  IDEs that fail 
to function or require standalones to provide full functionality 
violate the whole premise of Xtalks.  Unfortunately, *unlike Metacard*, 
RR suffers from exactly that disability, which is why a very tiny 
minority of us prefer the Metacard IDE.  Contrary to the hype, it is 
not *just* a difference in IDEs, but a true difference in philosophy.

That said, *if* your point in using RR is to develop standalones, I 
fail to understand the complaint.  Yes it doesn't dance well, but like 
the dancing bear, one should be impressed that the IDE dances at all.

On 26-Apr-04, at 7:36 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Dave,

This is supposed to be a "Professional" software development package -
I don't think that ignoring a problem like this is in any way
"professional".
How many other "professional" tools let you demo in the IDE? Maybe you
could let us know what standalone problems you are having, or run in
the MetaCard IDE, or suspend the IDE. Or call the IDE's menu item for
"Save" directly...
--
John R. Vokey, PhD
Professor
B.E.R.G. - Behaviour and Evolution Research Group
Micro-Cognition Laboratory
Department of Psychology & Neuroscience
University of Lethbridge
Lethbridge, Alberta T1K 3M4
CANADA
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution