vAlign Images in lines of text

2005-10-17 Thread Todd Geist
Hello, I used set imageSource to put a little Icon in a line of text. What I get is both the Icon and the text aligned to the text base line What I want is for the text to be centered on the Icon. Is this possible? Thanks Todd -- Todd Geist __ g e i s

vAlign Images in lines of text

2005-10-18 Thread Todd Geist
Hello, I used set imageSource to put a little Icon in a line of text. What I get is both the Icon and the text aligned to the text base line What I want is for the text to be centered on the Icon. Is this possible? Thanks Todd -- Todd Geist __ g e i s

Re: vAlign Images in lines of text

2005-10-17 Thread Scott Rossi
Recently, Todd Geist wrote: > I used set imageSource to put a little Icon in a line of text. > > What I get is both the Icon and the text aligned to the text base line > > What I want is for the text to be centered on the Icon. > > Is this possible? I've done this by adding transparent space

Re: vAlign Images in lines of text

2005-10-17 Thread Todd Geist
Thanks! On 10/17/05 8:37 AM, "Scott Rossi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've done this by adding transparent space to the image (top or bottom > depending on the image and the textHeight/textSize of the field). You may > also need to fiddle with the fixedLineheight to get the alignment to work.

Re: vAlign Images in lines of text

2005-10-17 Thread Ken Ray
On 10/17/05 10:17 AM, "Todd Geist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I used set imageSource to put a little Icon in a line of text. > > What I get is both the Icon and the text aligned to the text base line > > What I want is for the text to be centered on the Icon. > > Is this possible?

Textshift (Was: Re: vAlign Images in lines of text)

2005-10-25 Thread Dom
Ken Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The answer is "yes", you can use the little-known "textShift" property of > text to shift the image (or the text, your choice) above/below the baseline. Note that this also useful for larger text sizes, as "superscript" is a bit too "low" (it seems to be be mi