Re: interesting

2013-05-20 Thread Eric Newton
The version that will be 1.5.0... more-or-less. On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 10:13 PM, Jim Klucar wrote: > Eric, what version of Accumulo did you use? I'm assuming 1.5.0 > > > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > >> Definitely, with a note on the ingest job duration, too. >> >> >> O

Re: [VOTE] 1.5.0-RC4

2013-05-20 Thread Eric Newton
Tested so far using accumulo-1.5.0-bin.tar.gz: MD5 OK signature OK ran all functional tests: found ACCUMULO-1435 Ran against hadoop 1.0.4 OK Ran against hadoop 2.0.4-alpha OK Presently running Continuous Ingest and Random Walk. I should have results tomorrow. I don't see ACCUMULO-1435 holding u

Re: [VOTE] 1.5.0-RC4

2013-05-20 Thread Billie Rinaldi
good: - src tarball matches the SVN tag and contains no unexpected binaries - all files expected to exist in the maven repo exist (javadoc, sources, pom, jar for relevant modules, bin and src tarball, rpm and deb) - files are named in the expected way (way to go christopher!) - bin tarball contains

Re: [VOTE] 1.5.0-RC4

2013-05-20 Thread Christopher
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Billie Rinaldi wrote: > good: > - src tarball matches the SVN tag and contains no unexpected binaries > - all files expected to exist in the maven repo exist (javadoc, sources, > pom, jar for relevant modules, bin and src tarball, rpm and deb) > - files are named i

Re: [VOTE] 1.5.0-RC4

2013-05-20 Thread Billie Rinaldi
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Christopher wrote: > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Billie Rinaldi > wrote: > > good: > > - src tarball matches the SVN tag and contains no unexpected binaries > > - all files expected to exist in the maven repo exist (javadoc, sources, > > pom, jar for releva

master fails to start

2013-05-20 Thread Chris Retford
I searched the archive before posting and didn't find anything. I have a new system with 12 nodes (3 ZK), and a single user in the hadoop group. The master fails to start. It looks to me like it is unable to read /accumulo/instance_id in HDFS, but I can't think why that would be. Thanks in advance

Re: master fails to start

2013-05-20 Thread Christopher
What version of Accumulo are you running? Can you manually query HDFS as the same user Accumulo is running as? -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Chris Retford wrote: > I searched the archive before posting and didn't find anything. I have a

Re: master fails to start

2013-05-20 Thread John Vines
And what version of hadoop as well. On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Christopher wrote: > What version of Accumulo are you running? > Can you manually query HDFS as the same user Accumulo is running as? > > -- > Christopher L Tubbs II > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > > > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at

Re: master fails to start

2013-05-20 Thread Chris Retford
Accumulo 1.4.3. Hadoop is CDH3u6 (0.20.2). I can manually list files in Hadoop. Accumulo was able to run the init script. All accumulo directories in HDFS are world readable and executable. On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Christopher wrote: > What version of Accumulo are you running? > Can you

Re: master fails to start

2013-05-20 Thread Mike Drob
Looks like you might be running with a Java Security Policy in place. On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Chris Retford wrote: > Accumulo 1.4.3. Hadoop is CDH3u6 (0.20.2). I can manually list files in > Hadoop. Accumulo was able to run the init script. All accumulo directories > in HDFS are world r

Re: [VOTE] 1.5.0-RC4

2013-05-20 Thread Josh Elser
Need `expect` installed as well. Do we have this list written down elsewhere? Do we want to? Not suggesting that we need to take any action now; purely a down-the-road thought. On 05/19/2013 03:36 PM, Christopher wrote: To reproduce all the artifacts in this build, ensure you have all the prer

Re: [VOTE] 1.5.0-RC4

2013-05-20 Thread John Vines
Has bulk import been tested against this build for hadoop1 and 2? I'm hitting some issues, but it may be some downstream client cruft, I'm currently uncertain. On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > Need `expect` installed as well. Do we have this list written down > elsewhere? Do

Re: [VOTE] 1.5.0-RC4

2013-05-20 Thread Josh Elser
Aren't there some functional tests for bulk imports? On 05/20/2013 06:01 PM, John Vines wrote: Has bulk import been tested against this build for hadoop1 and 2? I'm hitting some issues, but it may be some downstream client cruft, I'm currently uncertain. On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Josh

Re: [VOTE] 1.5.0-RC4

2013-05-20 Thread Eric Newton
There are, but they don't do interesting things with different users' and permissions. -Eric On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > Aren't there some functional tests for bulk imports? > > > On 05/20/2013 06:01 PM, John Vines wrote: > >> Has bulk import been tested against this b

Re: [VOTE] 1.5.0-RC4

2013-05-20 Thread Josh Elser
+1 - MD5s and SHA1s, ok (thank you, maven staging repo and ctubbsii. See more below) - GPG sigs good. - Source release builds and runs, looks good in regards to what we are required to publish - Ran functional tests - Did a once-over on the user manual Unexpected things: - simple.largeRow.La