Re: [VOTE] 1.5.0-RC3

2013-05-17 Thread Christopher
Just trying to get consensus, so we can move forward. :) -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Adam Fuchs wrote: > Thanks for putting up with us picky people, Chris! > > Adam > > On May 17, 2013 6:15 PM, "Christopher" wrote: >> >> So, >> >> I'v

Re: [VOTE] 1.5.0-RC3

2013-05-17 Thread Adam Fuchs
Thanks for putting up with us picky people, Chris! Adam On May 17, 2013 6:15 PM, "Christopher" wrote: > So, > > I've fixed the problem with the src tarball including binaries, and I > believe I've satisfied all the concerns regarding the naming > conventions. > I'm going to go ahead and include

Re: [VOTE] 1.5.0-RC3

2013-05-17 Thread Christopher
So, I've fixed the problem with the src tarball including binaries, and I believe I've satisfied all the concerns regarding the naming conventions. I'm going to go ahead and include the nativemap soruce in the -bin.tar.gz, to satisfy some interested parties. I was also advised to include the assem

Re: [VOTE] 1.5.0-RC3

2013-05-17 Thread Keith Turner
I took a look at the binary tar, its sig and hashes looked good. I was able to run accumulo from it w/ no problem and the apidocs were there! Tried to run proxy from binary tarball, there was no proxy.properties or proxy/README. I diffed the src tarball w/ the tag and saw the following extra fil

Re: [VOTE] 1.5.0-RC3

2013-05-17 Thread Billie Rinaldi
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Christopher wrote: > All I did was: > mvn release:prepare && mvn release:perform > Thanks! On another note, it looks like there's an .so file in accumulo-project-1.5.0-src.tar.gz (the same file in two places). Billie > > -- > Christopher L Tubbs II > http://

Re: [VOTE] 1.5.0-RC3

2013-05-17 Thread Christopher
All I did was: mvn release:prepare && mvn release:perform -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Billie Rinaldi wrote: > On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Billie Rinaldi > wrote: >> >> Christopher, >> >> Release votes must contain a link to the

Re: [VOTE] 1.5.0-RC3

2013-05-17 Thread Billie Rinaldi
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Billie Rinaldi wrote: > Christopher, > > Release votes must contain a link to the SVN tag for the release. That is > part of the vote / release evaluation as well. Also, every vote should > contain the time frame in which votes will be accepted. For us this is >

Re: [VOTE] 1.5.0-RC3

2013-05-17 Thread Billie Rinaldi
Christopher, Release votes must contain a link to the SVN tag for the release. That is part of the vote / release evaluation as well. Also, every vote should contain the time frame in which votes will be accepted. For us this is typically 72 hours. Billie On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Chr

Re: [VOTE] 1.5.0-RC3

2013-05-17 Thread Christopher
There were three options to dropping "assemble" from the binary packages (ACCUMULO-1413): 1. Convoluted Maven patch: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12583347/ACCUMULO-1413.v1.patch that will probably cause more problems than it fixes, because it rotates the dependency graph on its

Re: [VOTE] 1.5.0-RC3

2013-05-17 Thread Adam Fuchs
How do HBase and a bazillion other apache projects do it? This really should not be too hard unless we are overly restricting our tool suit. If we have to add a two line script in mvn exec (nuclear option) to make the build look good we should do it. Adam On May 17, 2013 10:53 AM, "Billie Rinaldi

Re: [VOTE] 1.5.0-RC3

2013-05-17 Thread David Medinets
Let me clarify, I know the reference. On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:59 AM, David Medinets wrote: > Is 'voltron' a current pop reference? I'm thinking of someone reading > these messages 15 years from now. > > > On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Adam Fuchs wrote: > >> Looks like the src part of the

Re: [VOTE] 1.5.0-RC3

2013-05-17 Thread David Medinets
Is 'voltron' a current pop reference? I'm thinking of someone reading these messages 15 years from now. On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Adam Fuchs wrote: > Looks like the src part of the distribution is > accumulo-project-1.5.0-src.tar.gz. > For the same reasons that we removed the "assemble

Re: [VOTE] 1.5.0-RC3

2013-05-17 Thread Billie Rinaldi
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 7:35 AM, Adam Fuchs wrote: > Looks like the src part of the distribution is > accumulo-project-1.5.0-src.tar.gz. > For the same reasons that we removed the "assemble" tag form the bin > package, shouldn't we remove the "project" tag from the src package? This > also has i

Re: [VOTE] 1.5.0-RC3

2013-05-17 Thread Adam Fuchs
Looks like the src part of the distribution is accumulo-project-1.5.0-src.tar.gz. For the same reasons that we removed the "assemble" tag form the bin package, shouldn't we remove the "project" tag from the src package? This also has implications as to whether we can just untar both the bin and src

[VOTE] 1.5.0-RC3

2013-05-16 Thread Christopher
1.5.0-RC3 for consideration. https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-007/ -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii -- Forwarded message -- From: Nexus Repository Manager Date: Thu, May 16, 2013 at 9:02 PM Subject: Nexus: Staging Comple