Using Accumulo shell to add column visibility to cells containing Unicode values

2013-08-26 Thread Celeste Hofer
Hello, I am trying to add column visibility (a label) to cells containing Unicode values, using an Accumulo shell. However, I receive this ERROR: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Expected 4 arguments. There was 6. Is the use of the Accumulo shell supported for applying column visibility when

Re: Using Accumulo shell to add column visibility to cells containing Unicode values

2013-08-26 Thread John Vines
The java API is the most feature rich way of interfacing with Accumulo. The shell is a utility built on it, but occasionally issues get hit with parsing user input. It seems you have hit one of these cases. You may be able to quote your fields, etc. However, it is more important to note that the v

Re: Using Accumulo shell to add column visibility to cells containing Unicode values

2013-08-26 Thread Keith Turner
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Celeste Hofer wrote: > > Hello, > > I am trying to add column visibility (a label) to cells containing Unicode > values, using an Accumulo shell. > However, I receive this > ERROR: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Expected 4 arguments. There > was 6. > > > Is t

Re: Using Accumulo shell to add column visibility to cells containing Unicode values

2013-08-26 Thread Mike Drob
What version are you using? According to ACCUMULO-241, you should be able to quote any UTF-8 characters for visibility using the Java API. The shell will likely have parsing issues, however. [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-241 On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 3:56 PM, John Vines wrot

Re: Using Accumulo shell to add column visibility to cells containing Unicode values

2013-08-28 Thread Celeste Hofer
The version is 1.5, thanks for the info. On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Mike Drob wrote: > What version are you using? According to ACCUMULO-241, you should be able > to quote any UTF-8 characters for visibility using the Java API. The shell > will likely have parsing issues, however. > > [1]