Yes, it works! Thank you!
> Gesendet: Montag, 29. Mai 2017 um 12:16 Uhr
> Von: "Stefan Bodewig"
> An: user@ant.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: macrodef with parameters to pass to java task
>
> On 2017-05-29, Al Le wrote:
>
> > in my ant script I'd like to
he.org]
> Gesendet: Montag, 29. Mai 2017 12:17
> An: user@ant.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: macrodef with parameters to pass to java task
>
> On 2017-05-29, Al Le wrote:
>
> > in my ant script I'd like to define a macro (via macrodef) which
> would call the 'java' task
On 2017-05-29, Al Le wrote:
> in my ant script I'd like to define a macro (via macrodef) which would call
> the 'java' task as a part of its body/implementation.
> In the java task call in the macro, I want to just specify the main class
> name and the classpath
I'm sorry, the last closing tag in the example should of course be
"".
> Gesendet: Montag, 29. Mai 2017 um 12:04 Uhr
> Von: "Al Le"
> An: user@ant.apache.org
> Betreff: macrodef with parameters to pass to java task
>
> Hello,
>
> in my an
Hello,
in my ant script I'd like to define a macro (via macrodef) which would call the
'java' task as a part of its body/implementation.
In the java task call in the macro, I want to just specify the main class name
and the classpath. The parameters (which are usually specified
> Thanks, should be fixed in git, will be fixed in 1.9.8 and 1.10.0.
That's not fair! I've needed so long to identify the problem and create a bug
report, and you fix it so quickly! :-)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...
On 2016-04-17, Al Le wrote:
>> Please open a bug ticket.
> Created the bug report 59339.
Thanks, should be fixed in git, will be fixed in 1.9.8 and 1.10.0.
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For
My guess is that you are the first person who's trying what you do and
you've simply hit a bug.
[...]
Please open a bug ticket.
Created the bug report 59339.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For addit
On 2016-04-12, Al Le wrote:
> in my ant script, I define a task "MyTask" via "macrodef". The task
> has a mandatory attribute "nodeName" (not the camelCase name).
> Then I call the task from a javascript snippet:
> var myTask = project.createTa
Hello,
in my ant script, I define a task "MyTask" via "macrodef". The task has a
mandatory attribute "nodeName" (not the camelCase name).
Then I call the task from a javascript snippet:
var myTask = project.createTask('myTask');
myTask.setDynamicAttri
t;
> >> I can't seem to get the new if: and unless: attributes working on uses
> of
> >> macrodef. For example:
> >>
> >> >> xmlns:unless="ant:unless">
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> hi
> >
s,
>
> Antoine
> On Dec 9, 2013, at 9:22 AM, Steele, Richard wrote:
>
>> I can't seem to get the new if: and unless: attributes working on uses of
>> macrodef. For example:
>>
>> > xmlns:unless="ant:unless">
>>
>>
>>
Hello Richard,
this is a bug. I have entered it in bugzilla id 55885.
Regards,
Antoine
On Dec 9, 2013, at 9:22 AM, Steele, Richard wrote:
> I can't seem to get the new if: and unless: attributes working on uses of
> macrodef. For example:
>
> xmlns:u
I can't seem to get the new if: and unless: attributes working on uses of
macrodef. For example:
hi
If I do "ant hi" from the command line the script runs to completion, and
as expected, there's no output:
uot;Cloning" macrodef
> From: cyril.sa...@gmail.com
> To: user@ant.apache.org
>
> I had previously posted a question asking about macro scoping, I thought
> the community might be interested in my solution, perhaps the Ant experts
> can tell me how dangerous of a hack it may be? (I&#
I had previously posted a question asking about macro scoping, I thought
the community might be interested in my solution, perhaps the Ant experts
can tell me how dangerous of a hack it may be? (I'm on Ant 1.7.0, and
cannot up-rev)
First, restating my question:
Subject: "scoping" for macro de
I'm fairly certain you may be able to avoid the duplication...
From the documentation for javac,
"This task forms an implicit FileSet and supports most attributes of
(dir becomes srcdir) as well as the nested ,
and elements."
You can probably come up with a way to reuse the notation...
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Scot P. Floess wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Arguably, a little uglier notation...
I'm not worried about notation, but I'd like to avoid repetition;
using this method I would need to do repeat every excluded class name
twice: onc
cot P. Floess wrote:
Why not just use a child element for the macrodef? Something like:
Ah, I didn't realize that was possible.
That's better, but I also need to get rid of the class files (convert
is JavaCard converter and it takes all the class files in the
directory). Is
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Scot P. Floess wrote:
>
> Why not just use a child element for the macrodef? Something like:
Ah, I didn't realize that was possible.
>
>
>
>
That's better, but I also need to get rid of the class files (convert
is JavaCar
Why not just use a child element for the macrodef? Something like:
Then you can do things like:
On Thu, 8 Mar 2012, Noam Postavsky wrote:
I have a build.xml with some targets that are identical except for
some excluded classes
*mytokenizer *task would do substitutions for the %{*/token/*} entries.
The requirement is that the tokenization happen not as a pre-process step,
but during the execution of the *myentrypoint *target. Compiling code is not
available to me. Changing the requirements I need to live with is not
possible. I
tion of the *myentrypoint *target. Compiling code is not
available to me. Changing the requirements I need to live with is not
possible. I will define the *mytokenizer *macrodef or scriptdef in the same
file as the *myentrypoint *and I can use Ant 1.7, Ant-Contrib, and Groovy
code.
I'
will define the
*mytokenizer *macrodef or scriptdef in the same file as the *myentrypoint *and I can use Ant 1.7, Ant-Contrib, and Groovy code.
I'm trying to figure out how to define *mytokenizer *to solve this problem.
Thanks,
Steve Amerige
SAS Institute, Deployment Software Development
I've
misunderstood ;)
Flossy
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012, Steve Amerige wrote:
Hi all,
I'm looking to filter a macrodef element before it gets interpreted so as to
change it's behavior. Here's an example of what I'm talking about:
...
<%{mytask} %{myattribute}="%{myv
Hi all,
I'm looking to filter a macrodef element before it gets interpreted so as to change it's behavior. Here's an example of what I'm
talking about:
...
<%{mytask} %{myattribute}="%{myvalue}"/>
%{myblockofcode}
...
In other words, I want th
I should mention that doing this will execute just fine as I expect:
classname="org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Sequential"/>
I just loose that nice macrodef-ish @{param} expansion that
All,
I have what may seem like a strange question... I was looking through the
source for Ant Contrib's ForTask.java... I see it uses MacroDef
internally as well as MacroInstance to execute().
I've got a script def that has a child element entitled "seque
On 2011-11-09, Steve Amerige wrote:
> Thanks for your reply. This won't work because the macrodef won't
> have any knowledge of what to do as per my need.
I have to trust you on that.
> I think, therefore, my solution of having 2 macrodef elements is as
&
Hi Stefan,
Thanks for your reply. This won't work because the macrodef won't have any knowledge of what to do as per my need. I think,
therefore, my solution of having 2 macrodef elements is as close as I can get:
...
...
So, then the question shifts a bit: in a macrodef, ass
On 2011-11-08, Steve Amerige wrote:
> I'd like to do something like:
>
>
>
> ...
>
>
>
>...
>
> Within the macrodef, there would be places it would return true and
> other places it returns false. I want th
Hi,
Thanks for the feedback. Actually, the use of Ant-Contrib is okay.
But, please note that it isn't just a property that I'd want to set. It's really the ability to look at the "return" values of a
macrodef and use that result with an task. I do realize that a
Assuming no use of AntContrib, you can pass the name of a property to the
Macrodef, which it would set. This property could then be used in an Ant
condition. I'd give in and use AntContrib though, since it gives you an
task.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Amerige [mailto:steve
I'd like to do something like:
...
...
Within the macrodef, there would be places it would return true and other places it returns false. I want the solution to be wholly
in Ant (no Java, Groovy, external file use, etc.).
Is it possible? If so
Hi all,
What are the pros/cons of choosing runtarget vs. macrodef as "functions" under
these assumptions:
1. Ant is going to be used as a procedural language for complex coding.
Please just accept this assumption. :-)
2. No more than a page or so of coding should be in any on
er claimed to be useful 8-)
> Maybe I'm looking at the wrong part in the code for where *element*
> names (such as macrodef and scriptdef) are validated and where other
> names (such as property name="...") are validated.
You are.
In the end the XML parser decides what is
t what I've heard in this mailing list is that I should
use instead. Are there any things that I won't be able to do with macrodef that I could do with runtarget (and the other
way around)? The one advantage of using runtarget is that in Eclipse it shows up in Outline view as an unfille
amp; c != ':') {
return false;
}
}
return true;
}
Maybe I'm looking at the wrong part in the code for where *element* names (such as macrodef and scriptdef) are validated and where
other names (such as property na
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Steve Amerige wrote:
> Hi Dominique and all,
>
> After considering that scriptdef, macrodef, and perhaps some other tags do
> not allow neither the "-" nor the "." as an initial character, I'm going to
> use the "_&q
Hi Dominique and all,
After considering that scriptdef, macrodef, and perhaps some other tags do not allow neither the "-" nor the "." as an initial
character, I'm going to use the "_" character name prefix to indicate that a name is "local" to
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Dominique Devienne
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Dominique Devienne
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Steve Amerige wrote:
>>> I'm looking for the authoritative specification within Ant for the value of
>>> the name attribute
>> PS: Also
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Dominique Devienne wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Steve Amerige wrote:
>> I'm looking for the authoritative specification within Ant for the value of
>> the name attribute
> PS: Also keep in mind that property expansion does occurs inside these
> names
Hi Dominique,
Thanks for the info. And, also thanks for the specific example of the leading
"-" character.
Because Ant has only a global namespace for property names (and other names like macrodef, etc.), and for the case that a particular
ant script inherits properties from the c
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Steve Amerige wrote:
> I'm looking for the authoritative specification within Ant for the value of
> the name attribute as in:
>
>
>
>
>
> and so forth. I can't find within the Ant manual any BNF that defines what
> a valid name is allowed to be.
Anything goes
types.html#NMTOKEN
However, without the Ant manual explicitly telling me that this is something that applies to the name value for property, macrodef,
target, etc., I can't be 100% sure. Maybe property allows for one syntax. Maybe macrodef allows for another.
Is there a BNF descrip
gValue);
self.log(i);
if (i >= 0)
{
project.setProperty("isSubstring","true");
}
]]>
From: Scot P. Floess
To: Eric Fetzer
Sent: Thu, January 21, 2010 12:48:23 PM
Subject: Re: AppendToProperty
time: 0 seconds
From: Scot P. Floess
To: Eric Fetzer
Sent: Thu, January 21, 2010 11:20:33 AM
Subject: Re: AppendToProperty MacroDef
Eric:
I didn't get a chance to look into any of this today. Making up some
hours for coming in late on Monday :( Well
al with an @:
string myString = @"C:\Program Files\JavaScript\is\goofy";
Thanks,
Eric
From: Scot P. Floess
To: Ant Users List
Sent: Thu, January 21, 2010 9:08:03 AM
Subject: Re: AppendToProperty MacroDef
Interesting... OK :(
On Thu, 21 Jan 201
Sent: Thu, January 21, 2010 8:48:29 AM
Subject: Re: AppendToProperty MacroDef
Will you echo ${myProp} itself? For example before the first
propertyregex...
Sorry, I don't have time right this minute to look at this and type in the
example :)
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, Eric Fetzer wrote:
A
: AppendToProperty MacroDef
Will you echo ${myProp} itself? For example before the first
propertyregex...
Sorry, I don't have time right this minute to look at this and type in the
example :)
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, Eric Fetzer wrote:
> And to leverage your \n example:
>
>
>
>
>
ubject: Re: AppendToProperty MacroDef
And to leverage your \n example:
Produces:
main:
[echo] tmpProp is: C:\noDog\Hates\Big\Juicy\Bones
[echo] tmpProp is: C:\\noDog\\Hates\\Big\\Juicy\\Bones
[echo] tmpProp is: C:\noDog\\Hates\
a:257)
at org.apache.tools.ant.launch.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:104)
Total time: 0 seconds
From: Eric Fetzer
To: Ant Users List
Sent: Thu, January 21, 2010 8:28:07 AM
Subject: Re: AppendToProperty MacroDef
Let me give you a better example Scot. Substit
: AppendToProperty MacroDef
Let me give you a better example Scot. Substitution seems to ignore escape
characters entirely. As the task is written now, I don't imagine there is a
way to replace \'s.
Produces:
main:
[echo] tmpP
104)
Total time: 0 seconds
From: Scot P. Floess
To: Ant Users List
Sent: Thu, January 21, 2010 8:09:33 AM
Subject: Re: AppendToProperty MacroDef
I might be wrong but I think the output you are seeing is correct - as in
the \ is escapeed thereby printing only
true;
I'll take a look at how to achieve this tomorrow. Thanks!
Eric
From: Scot P. Floess
To: Ant Users List
Sent: Wed, January 20, 2010 2:21:41 PM
Subject: Re: AppendToProperty MacroDef
Mmm - you may need to do this before your first propertyregex
Basicall
Wed, January 20, 2010 2:21:41 PM
Subject: Re: AppendToProperty MacroDef
Mmm - you may need to do this before your first propertyregex
Basically the above will escape the \
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Eric Fetzer wrote:
Well, out of that error and on to the next. It seems that PropertyRegEx has an
issue
Of(string1) >= 0) then return true;
I'll take a look at how to achieve this tomorrow. Thanks!
Eric
From: Scot P. Floess
To: Ant Users List
Sent: Wed, January 20, 2010 2:21:41 PM
Subject: Re: AppendToProperty MacroDef
Mmm - you may need to do this before your first propertyregex
re
From: Scot P. Floess
To: Ant Users List
Sent: Wed, January 20, 2010 2:21:41 PM
Subject: Re: AppendToProperty MacroDef
Mmm - you may need to do this before your first propertyregex
Basically the above will escape the \
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Eric Fetzer wr
Sent: Wed, January 20, 2010 2:21:41 PM
Subject: Re: AppendToProperty MacroDef
Mmm - you may need to do this before your first propertyregex
regexp="\\" replace="" globale="true"/>
Basically the above will escape the \
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Eric Fet
ue;
I'll take a look at how to achieve this tomorrow. Thanks!
Eric
From: Scot P. Floess
To: Ant Users List
Sent: Wed, January 20, 2010 2:21:41 PM
Subject: Re: AppendToProperty MacroDef
Mmm - you may need to do this before your first propertyregex
Ba
gEx has an issue
with the "\" as well. I wrote a different macrodef that works without slashes,
but
Well, out of that error and on to the next. It seems that PropertyRegEx has an
issue with the "\" as well. I wrote a different macrodef that works without
slashes, but not with slashes. Anyone see a
Beautiful, thanks Scott!
On Jan 20, 2010, at 1:18 PM, "Scot P. Floess" wrote:
You could use Ant Contrib's var task - probably be a little easier :)
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Eric Fetzer wrote:
Hi all. I wrote a MacroDef to append a string to a property. All wo
You could use Ant Contrib's var task - probably be a little easier :)
value="$...@{var.propertyname}}@{var.stringAppend}"/>
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Eric Fetzer wrote:
Hi all. I wrote a MacroDef to append a string to a property. All works as planned until
Why not to use instead? With you can
pragmatically access parameters instead of macro substitution.
- Alexey.
On 20.01.2010 12:10, Eric Fetzer wrote:
Hi all. I wrote a MacroDef to append a string to a property. All works as planned until
you slip a "\" in there and then it gets
Hi all. I wrote a MacroDef to append a string to a property. All works as
planned until you slip a "\" in there and then it gets jacked up. My
javascripting has MUCH to be desired. Any help?
<![CDATA[
curVal=project.getProperty("
macrotask.execute();
]]>
Thanks Antoine!
From: Eric Fetzer
To: Ant Users List
Sent: Wed, December 30, 2009 10:02:45 AM
Subject: Re: Call a Macrodef using a property?
Sorry, should have looked
Sorry, should have looked better at the library dependencies. Needed bsf,
logFactory, and js.jar. Thanks again!
From: Eric Fetzer
To: Ant Users List
Sent: Wed, December 30, 2009 9:49:38 AM
Subject: Re: Call a Macrodef using a property?
Thanks Antoine. I
#x27;m guessing there's a simpler
way to allow scripting in Ant.
Thanks Again,
Eric
From: Antoine Levy Lambert
To: Ant Users List
Sent: Wed, December 30, 2009 9:01:57 AM
Subject: Re: Call a Macrodef using a property?
Hello Eric,
you would have to embed
ding page in the manual (under optional tasks,
Script) and at the library dependencies.
Regards,
Antoine
Eric Fetzer wrote:
Is there any way to call a macrodef with the name of the macrodef held in a
property? Like this (of course this doesn't work):
Is it possible to load a macrodef in a subproject and have it usable in the
calling project?
I've got a task flow that's roughly:
ParentProject calls load target on SubProject.
SubProject loads antlib containing macrodefs.
ParentProject calls loaded macro.
I know this isn't suppo
116 Paris
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@ant.apache.org
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.co
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 09:28, EetieD wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to use " has been set. When I use the code below, it never comes into the part after
> instead of "
> Thanks for helping.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
[...]
>
Attributes within
Hi,
I am trying to use "
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/isset-within-macrodef...-tp25746232p25746232.html
Sent from the Ant - Users mailing list archive at Nabbl
I got ur point.. thank u very much.
Regards,
Vishy
-Original Message-
From: Scot P. Floess [mailto:sflo...@nc.rr.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 5:34 PM
To: Ant Users List
Subject: RE: problem with macrodef in ant
The only real exploration I did was to review your code ;)
When I
Java" fork="yes">
Thanks & Regards,
vishy
-Original Message-
From: Scot P. Floess [mailto:sflo...@nc.rr.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 2:37 AM
To: Ant Users List
Subject: RE: problem with macrodef in ant
Oh your welcome - I hope it w
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Thanks & Regards,
vishy
-----Original Message-
From: Scot P. Floess [mailto:sflo...@nc.rr.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 2:37 AM
To: Ant Us
rom Scot P. Floess
Sent Tue 7/28/2009 7:58 PM
To Ant Users List
Subject RE: problem with macrodef in ant
No you miss my point completely...
I don't think you need to set a property at all :)
Look below. Specifically where I comment in your call to the task.
I list the comment as &quo
roblem with macrodef in ant
No you miss my point completely...
I don't think you need to set a property at all :)
Look below. Specifically where I comment in your call to the task.
I list the comment as "C
So from what I can see, you are trying to set a property to store your
command line argument - when its really unnecessary. Just use it inline
as I have done above...
No need for another macrodef - just modify the task inside the
current macrodef.
Also, I note you have a simil
as u know, i used only one microdef for 2 different targets. will i try with
different macrodef for every target?
-Original Message-
>From Scot P. Floess
Sent Tue 7/28/2009 4:49 PM
To Ant Users List
Subject RE: problem with macrodef in ant
Actually, why don't you just
oogle. I tried but no use. Any
suggestions?
Thanks
Vishy
-Original Message-
From: Scot P. Floess [mailto:sflo...@nc.rr.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 8:38 PM
To: Ant Users List
Subject: RE: problem with macrodef in ant
Double check your setting of bindingarg:
Well one way I can think of off the top of my head is to use Ant Contrib's
task...
I need to look over what you did in your macrodef and give it some
thought...
you do see the problem though?
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, edumudi.viswan...@oracle.com wrote:
Is there any alternative solutio
: problem with macrodef in ant
Double check your setting of bindingarg:
For your first run, you set the property bingding.arg to:
-b "@{bindingfile}"
Of course assuming binding.arg wasn't already set ;)
For your second run, you cannot reset binding.a
ed to reset the property you may need to look to Ant Contrib or do
something different...
Basically, it gets set correctly the first time but not the second...
If you put an right after
your element - I think you will see the attribute is set
correctly in your macrodef... Its just how yo
Further to below mail, I found that it failing @ the following code in macrodef.
>
>
>
> value="${cxf.etc.dir}/l
essage-
From: Scot P. Floess [mailto:sflo...@nc.rr.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 7:39 PM
To: Ant Users List
Subject: Re: problem with macrodef in ant
I tried your example but cutting down on everything in wsdl2java - meaning
just used some statements...
It worked fine for me:
ant
...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Friends,
I have macrodef in build.xml & it took parameters like wsdlfile & bindingfile from wsdl2java tag ie
.
Now, If I run macrodef with wsdlfile1 & bindingfile1, It works asusually.
But if I run same macrodef again with wsdlfile2 & bindingfile2, In that case it
Hi Friends,
I have macrodef in build.xml & it took parameters like wsdlfile & bindingfile
from wsdl2java tag ie .
Now, If I run macrodef with wsdlfile1 & bindingfile1, It works asusually.
But if I run same macrodef again with wsdlfile2 & bindingfile2, In that case it
based upon the attributes in testOutput.
What you see here is that attributes get expanded before properties
when the macrodef is run. When the forth echo task is run the message
attribute is scanned for @{} first and the result is passed to the
task itself - which does the property expansion (
value1 = [...@{value}]
[echo] 5: Name5 [...@{name}] value5 = [...@{value}]
I was "hoping" for myMessage1, myMessage4 and myMessage5 to be
expanded based upon the attributes in testOutput.
What you see here is that attributes get expanded before properties
when the macrodef is run. W
e5 [...@{name}] value5 = [...@{value}]
> I was "hoping" for myMessage1, myMessage4 and myMessage5 to be
> expanded based upon the attributes in testOutput.
What you see here is that attributes get expanded before properties
when the macrodef is run. When the forth echo tas
I have a question about attribute expansion for macrodefs...
Consider the following:
"${myMessage1}"/>
The variable is defined in the build.xml file. The only thing the macrodef file
needs to have in advance in the name of the attribute, not the value.
--
Charles Knell
ckn...@onebox.com - email
-Original Message-
From: Mark Waschkowski
Sent: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 16:28:38 -0500
To
Hi,
Thanks, but no.
I have my macrodefs stored in one file, and I import it in the 'real' build
file like so:
I want to pass in my 'real' build properties to the macrodefs without
defining values in the macrodef file. This works using elements, but not
with attributes - am
I set up properties
in the "init" target and use references to them in the macrodefs.
Here's an example
I then refer to the property in t
Hi all,
First time poster, hi! Thanks to the devs for ant, been using it for years
now. I tried to do something new by creating a macrodef, but ran into some
problems with passing in a classpath, and didn't see any solutions having
gone through the mailing list archive. I've created
name of the id:
>>
>>|
>>|-- 1234
>>| |
>>| |-- yo1234.order
>>| |-- 8211_020_yo1234.pdf
>>|
>>|-- 1236
>>|
>>|-- yo1236.order
>> |-- 8211_040_yo1236.pdf
>>
>>
>> I´ve got everyth
ng when I enter the
> filename to use manually (s. property "todo" in XML
> below).
> I guess, I have to put all the actions into a
> macrodef and pass the filename as a parameter.
>
> I would enume
040_yo1236.pdf
I´ve got everything working when I enter the filename to use manually (s.
property "todo" in XML below).
I guess, I have to put all the actions into a macrodef and pass the filename as
a parameter.
I would enumerate all the files in that dir with a fileset, but how can I g
1 - 100 of 184 matches
Mail list logo
