+1 on this effort
Original message From: Chamikara Jayalath
Date: 6/6/18 2:09 PM (GMT-08:00) To:
d...@beam.apache.org, user@beam.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [BEAM-4126]
Deleting Maven build files (pom.xml) grace period?
+1 for the overall effort. As Pablo mentioned, we
Wouldn't the following code give you information about failed insertions
(around line 790 in BigQueryServicesImpl) ?
if (!allErrors.isEmpty()) {
throw new IOException("Insert failed: " + allErrors);
Cheers
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 7:16 AM, Carlos Alonso wrote:
> Hi everyone!!
>
> I
It seems an improvement can be made where if CREATE_NEVER is present, table
with field based partitioning doesn't have to be associated with a schema.
Cheers
On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 2:30 PM, Carlos Alonso wrote:
> Otherwise the BQ load job fails with the above error as well (Table with
> field
, once more runners catch up with the support: currently we have Dataflow
> and Flink. +Chamikara Jayalath is currently
> working on implementing it using SDFs in the Python SDK.
>
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 4:34 PM Ted Yu wrote:
>
>> Eugene:
>> Very informative talk.
>
Eugene:
Very informative talk.
I looked at:
sdks/java/core/src/test/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/transforms/splittabledofn/OffsetRangeTrackerTest.java
Is there some example showing how OffsetRangeTracker works with Kafka
partition(s) ?
Thanks
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 3:58 PM, Eugene Kirpichov
wrote:
As far as I can tell, there is no support.
FYI
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 7:34 AM, ramesh krishnan muthusamy <
ramkrish1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Team,
> Does Apache Beam provide API's for Apache Spark Dataframes as a part for
> Spark 2.0.
>
> -Ramesh
>
>
There wouldn't be new Kafka 0.9.x release.
+1 on dropping support for 0.9.x
On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 4:12 PM, Raghu Angadi wrote:
> Is anyone using Apache Beam with Kafka 0.9.x and older?
>
> I am thinking of deprecating 0.9.x and 0.10.0 in Beam 2.4 and remove
> support in 2.5 or later. 0.10.1 an
+1 to BoF
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 5:00 PM, Dmitry Demeshchuk
wrote:
> Probably won't be attending the conference, but totally down for a BoF.
>
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 4:58 PM, Holden Karau
> wrote:
>
>> Do interested folks have any timing constraints around a BoF?
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018
+1 on dropping Java 7 support.
