Hi.
I was just about to install Trac, when I found Bloodhound. I have tried
installing it, and it seems ok. But at the same time it also looks like the
project is more or less dead - last release was 2014-12-11, the documentation
has unfinished things, e.g. the section about git here:
https:/
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 6:38 AM, Torben Lauritzen wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I was just about to install Trac, when I found Bloodhound. I have tried
> installing it, and it seems ok. But at the same time it also looks like the
> project is more or less dead - last release was 2014-12-11, the
> documentatio
JFTR , I am working on a private fork of Bloodhound that I use for my
deployments . Nonetheless I've had to slow down my dev speed because
I'm contributing with code to the Brython project , and I've not had
all the time I'd like these days for BH dev .
On 9/10/15, Ryan J Ollos wrote:
> On Thu,
Hi.
Thank you for your replies - I will go with the standard Trac for the moment
then. But I will be following Bloodhound.
/Torben
> -Original Message-
> From: Olemis Lang [mailto:ole...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 11. september 2015 05:57
> To: user@bloodhound.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Is it al
I think going to Trac is a good decision. With all due respect to the BH
team, I think it still has a long way to go. I first gave BH a try, but it
had too many bugs or configuration limits. I then decided to try Trac, and
I found that it was very rock solid.
On Sep 10, 2015 9:42 PM, "Torben Lau
I went with Request Tracker. It has a different set of problems --
every ticket system does -- but it seems more manageable and definitely
has active support.
https://www.bestpractical.com/rt/
In fairness to the BH team, this is a symptom of a systemic problem with
Apache projects that aren'
