riday, September 11, 2015 12:49 AM
To: user@bloodhound.apache.org
Subject: RE: Is it alive?
+1 to the point about users being demanding.
What are the chances of getting a company to sponsor a developer to work on
this full-time? I ask coz I think this project is totally worth doing and would
be willi
I think you’re missing my point. It already has a company behind it – Apache.
From: Vijay Varadan [mailto:vi...@axham.com]
Sent: Friday, September 11, 2015 12:49 AM
To: user@bloodhound.apache.org
Subject: RE: Is it alive?
+1 to the point about users being demanding.
What are the
*Sent:* Friday, September 11, 2015 12:52 PM
*To:* user@bloodhound.apache.org
*Subject:* Re: Is it alive?
And we went with Redmine (multi product support was a requirement).
If you don’t need multi product support, I think Trac has the
advantage that if/when Bloodhound becomes under active develo
reasonably. I suspect there might be others that would be up for it
as well.
-Vijay Varadan
From: Oscar Edvardsson [mailto:os...@monivent.se]
Sent: Friday, September 11, 2015 12:52 PM
To: user@bloodhound.apache.org
Subject: Re: Is it alive?
And we went with Redmine (multi product support
lies - I will go with the standard Trac for the moment
>> then. But I will be following Bloodhound.
>>
>> /Torben
>>
>> > -----Original Message-
>> > From: Olemis Lang [mailto:ole...@gmail.com <mailto:ole...@gmail.com>]
>> > Sent: 11. septemb
solid.
> On Sep 10, 2015 9:42 PM, "Torben Lauritzen" wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>>
>> Thank you for your replies - I will go with the standard Trac for the
>> moment then. But I will be following Bloodhound.
>>
>> /Torben
>>
>> > -----Or
e...@gmail.com>]
> Sent: 11. september 2015 05:57
> To: user@bloodhound.apache.org <mailto:user@bloodhound.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Is it alive?
>
> JFTR , I am working on a private fork of Bloodhound that I use
for my
> deployments . Nonetheless
> Sent: 11. september 2015 05:57
> > To: user@bloodhound.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Is it alive?
> >
> > JFTR , I am working on a private fork of Bloodhound that I use for my
> > deployments . Nonetheless I've had to slow down my dev speed because I'm
> > con
Hi.
Thank you for your replies - I will go with the standard Trac for the moment
then. But I will be following Bloodhound.
/Torben
> -Original Message-
> From: Olemis Lang [mailto:ole...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 11. september 2015 05:57
> To: user@bloodhound.apache.org
> Sub
JFTR , I am working on a private fork of Bloodhound that I use for my
deployments . Nonetheless I've had to slow down my dev speed because
I'm contributing with code to the Brython project , and I've not had
all the time I'd like these days for BH dev .
On 9/10/15, Ryan J Ollos wrote:
> On Thu,
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 6:38 AM, Torben Lauritzen wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I was just about to install Trac, when I found Bloodhound. I have tried
> installing it, and it seems ok. But at the same time it also looks like the
> project is more or less dead - last release was 2014-12-11, the
> documentatio
Hi.
I was just about to install Trac, when I found Bloodhound. I have tried
installing it, and it seems ok. But at the same time it also looks like the
project is more or less dead - last release was 2014-12-11, the documentation
has unfinished things, e.g. the section about git here:
https:/
12 matches
Mail list logo