and yes, you need to set the consistency level to ONE in the cassandra.yaml
if it's running in your local machine
denylist_consistency_level: ONE
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 10:41 AM Cheng Wang wrote:
> Awesome! That's great to hear!
> Pls feel free to let me know if you have any questions!
>
> Th
Awesome! That's great to hear!
Pls feel free to let me know if you have any questions!
Thanks,
Cheng
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 10:36 AM Aaron Ploetz wrote:
> Works!
>
> So I was running on my *local*, and all of my attempts to add to the
> denylist were failing because the denylist_consistency_le
Works!
So I was running on my *local*, and all of my attempts to add to the
denylist were failing because the denylist_consistency_level was set to
QUORUM:
WARN [main] 2022-10-25 11:57:27,238 NoSpamLogger.java:108 - Attempting to
load denylist and not enough nodes are available for a QUORUM refr
Sequentially, and yes - for some definition of "directly" - but not just
because it's sequential, but also because each sstable has cost in reading
(e.g. JVM garbage created when you open/seek that has to be collected after
the read)
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 8:27 AM Grzegorz Pietrusza
wrote:
> HI
HI all
I can't find any information about how cassandra handles reads involving
multiple sstables. Are sstables read concurrently or sequentially? Is read
latency directly connected to the number of opened sstables?
Regards
Grzegorz
