Re: Problems with subcolumn retrieval after upgrade from 0.6 to 0.7

2011-04-19 Thread Abraham Sanderson
ytes for the super > column and column names. > > Aaron > > > On 19 Apr 2011, at 09:26, Abraham Sanderson wrote: > > I wish it were consistent enough that the answer were simple... It varies > between just the requested subcolumn to all subcolumns. It always does > ret

Re: Problems with subcolumn retrieval after upgrade from 0.6 to 0.7

2011-04-18 Thread Abraham Sanderson
???" Is it possible that I am inadvertently using a reserved token or something on my supercolumn name and this is screwing with the slice command? Abe On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 2:55 PM, aaron morton wrote: > When you run the get_slice which columns are returned ? > > > Aaron > >

Re: Problems with subcolumn retrieval after upgrade from 0.6 to 0.7

2011-04-18 Thread Abraham Sanderson
, the position shouldn't be changing at all. Abe Sanderson On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 5:38 PM, aaron morton wrote: > Can you run the same request as a get_slice naming the column in the > SlicePredicate and see what comes back ? > > Can you reproduce the fault with logging set at D

Problems with subcolumn retrieval after upgrade from 0.6 to 0.7

2011-04-15 Thread Abraham Sanderson
I'm having some issues with a few of my ColumnFamilies after a cassandra upgrade/import from 0.6.1 to 0.7.4. I followed the instructions to upgrade and everything seem to work OK...until I got into the application and noticed some wierd behavior. I was getting the following stacktrace in cassandr