Re: C* as fluent data storage, 10MB/sec/node?

2018-11-28 Thread Adam Smith
ounded. > > Use TWCS, TTLs and something like 5-10 minute buckets. Don’t use RF=1, but > you can write at CL ONE. TWCS will largely just drop whole sstables as they > expire (especially with 3.11 and the more aggressive expiration logic there) > > > > -- > Jeff Jirsa > >

C* as fluent data storage, 10MB/sec/node?

2018-11-28 Thread Adam Smith
Hi All, I need to use C* somehow as fluent data storage - maybe this is different to the queue antipattern? Lots of data come in (10MB/sec/node), remains for e.g. 1 hour and should then be evicted. It is somehow not critical when data would occasionally disappear/get lost. Thankful for any

Wide rows splitting

2017-09-17 Thread Adam Smith
Dear community, I have a table with inlinks to URLs, i.e. many URLs point to http://google.com, less URLs point to http://somesmallweb.page. It has very wide and very skinny rows - the distribution is following a power law. I do not know a priori how many columns a row has. Also, I can't