.0-b17, mixed mode)
>
>
>
>
> 23.07.2012, 20:12, "Joost van de Wijgerd" :
>> Howmuch memory do you have on the machine. Seems like you have 8G
>> reserved for the Cassandra java process, If this is all the memory on
>> the machine you might be swapping. Also
2567721 0/0
>>> 0/100
>>> INFO [ScheduledTasks:1] 2012-07-16 13:10:50,085 StatusLogger.java (line
>>> 88) system.NodeIdInfo 0,0 0/0
>>> 0/1
>>> INFO [ScheduledTasks:1] 2012-07-16 13:10:50,086 StatusLogger.java (line
>>> 88) system.IndexInfo 0,0 0/0
>>> 0/1
>>> INFO [ScheduledTasks:1] 2012-07-16 13:10:50,086 StatusLogger.java (line
>>> 88) system.LocationInfo 0,0 0/0
>>> 1/2
>>> INFO [ScheduledTasks:1] 2012-07-16 13:10:50,086 StatusLogger.java (line
>>> 88) system.Migrations 0,0 0/0
>>> 3/3
>>> INFO [ScheduledTasks:1] 2012-07-16 13:10:50,087 StatusLogger.java (line
>>> 88) system.HintsColumnFamily1,528 0/0
>>> 0/1
>>> INFO [ScheduledTasks:1] 2012-07-16 13:10:50,087 StatusLogger.java (line
>>> 88) system.Schema 0,0 0/0
>>> 2/3
>>> Завершение пересылаемого сообщения
--
Joost van de Wijgerd
Visseringstraat 21B
1051KH Amsterdam
+31624111401
joost.van.de.wijgerd@Skype
http://www.linkedin.com/in/jwijgerd
the default but in the CF properties the
HeapAllocator
can be set.
If you want I can try to create a patch myself and submit it to you?
Kind Regards
Joost
--
Joost van de Wijgerd
Visseringstraat 21B
1051KH Amsterdam
+31624111401
joost.van.de.wijgerd@Skype
http://www.linkedin.com/in/jwijgerd
t; and restarted the next. this one got stuck on the AMI init startup. i
> cancelled it, rebooted againg and now it't suck with "[INFO]
> 07/02/12-15:42:29 Received 0 of 1 responses from: "
>
> suggestions on how to fix this?
>
>
> thanks,
> deno
Hi Jonathan,
Looks good, any chance of porting this fix to the 1.0 branch?
Kind regards
Joost
Sent from my iPhone
On 1 jul. 2012, at 09:25, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Joost van de Wijgerd
> wrote:
>> the currentThoughput is increased even before
thy; since the amount of "time flushing" : "time not
> flushing" ratio is quite small, reducing it further is going to give
> you negligible benefit (in exchange for longer replay times.)
>
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 5:09 AM, Joost van de Wijgerd
> wrote:
> &g
