Ah, right. Unfortunately the old google groups for Cassandra are
deleted, hence the broken links.
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 4:06 AM, gabriele renzi wrote:
> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
>> Doesn't ring a bell. Maybe if you included the link to which you refer?
>
> I gues
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> Doesn't ring a bell. Maybe if you included the link to which you refer?
I guess this is the related post
http://spyced.blogspot.com/2009/05/consistent-hashing-vs-order-preserving.html
thought I believe the original poster misphrased or mi
Doesn't ring a bell. Maybe if you included the link to which you refer?
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 10:37 AM, JKnight JKnight wrote:
> Dear all,
> At the blog of JONATHAN ELLIS, he said that Cassandra use a hack (trick) for
> distributing key for each node. But the link point to that document is not
Dear all,
At the blog of JONATHAN ELLIS, he said that Cassandra use a hack (trick) for
distributing key for each node. But the link point to that document is not
available.
Could you tell me more about that algorithm?
Thank
--
Best regards,
JKnight
