Re: Bug in Cassandra that occurs when removing a supercolumn.

2010-04-07 Thread Jonathan Ellis
If you can make a reproducible test case using the example CF definitions, that would be great. On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Matthew Grogan wrote: > In both my cases the re-inserts have a higher timestamp. > On 7 April 2010 20:13, Jonathan Ellis wrote: >> >> Your re-insert needs to have a hig

Re: Bug in Cassandra that occurs when removing a supercolumn.

2010-04-07 Thread Matthew Grogan
In both my cases the re-inserts have a higher timestamp. On 7 April 2010 20:13, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > Your re-insert needs to have a higher timestamp than the delete, this is > normal. > > On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Matthew Grogan > wrote: > > I am seeing a similar problem running on 0.

Re: Bug in Cassandra that occurs when removing a supercolumn.

2010-04-07 Thread Jonathan Ellis
Your re-insert needs to have a higher timestamp than the delete, this is normal. On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Matthew Grogan wrote: > I am seeing a similar problem running on 0.6 rc1. > The data/logs have existed since 0.5. > If I insert a new row then delete and re-insert then it works fine.

Re: Bug in Cassandra that occurs when removing a supercolumn.

2010-04-07 Thread Matthew Grogan
I am seeing a similar problem running on 0.6 rc1. The data/logs have existed since 0.5. If I insert a new row then delete and re-insert then it works fine. If I delete a row that was created under 0.5 then delete and re-insert then the insert silently fails. I can delete the data/logs and start

Re: Bug in Cassandra that occurs when removing a supercolumn.

2010-04-04 Thread Jonathan Ellis
We do appreciate the effort, though. :) On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 3:42 AM, Arash Bazrafshan wrote: > Vijay, I know I've written a ridiculously long bug-specification, but heck > at least I've mentioned all the important stuff. :-) > > Look under PREREQUISITES and you see I've mentioned that I use 0.

Re: Bug in Cassandra that occurs when removing a supercolumn.

2010-04-04 Thread Arash Bazrafshan
Vijay, I know I've written a ridiculously long bug-specification, but heck at least I've mentioned all the important stuff. :-) Look under PREREQUISITES and you see I've mentioned that I use 0.5.0-1 under ubuntu. I agree that CASSANDRA-703 is exactly the same bug as the one I've observed, and yet

Re: Bug in Cassandra that occurs when removing a supercolumn.

2010-04-03 Thread Vijay
What version do you use? i think that bug was fixed in .6 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-703 Regards, On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Arash Bazrafshan wrote: > ello. > > A bug occurs for me when working with Cassandra. > > With this e-mail I intend to show what I do to

Bug in Cassandra that occurs when removing a supercolumn.

2010-04-03 Thread Arash Bazrafshan
ello. A bug occurs for me when working with Cassandra. With this e-mail I intend to show what I do to recreate it, and then perhaps you can try it out too. SUMMARY OF THE BUG: (1): insert a row with a supercolumn that contains a subcolumn. (2) remove the supercolumn. (3) reinsert the sa