Re: Denormalization leads to terrible, rather than better, Cassandra performance -- I am really puzzled

-leads-to-terrible-rather-than-better-Cassandra-performance-I-am-really-puzzled-tp7600561p7600618.html Sent from the cassandra-u...@incubator.apache.org mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Denormalization leads to terrible, rather than better, Cassandra performance -- I am really puzzled

>> >> 1 instance >> >> 5 instances >> >> 10 instances >> >> Normalized >> >> 7% usr, 2% sys >> >> 30% usr, 8% sys >> >> 40% usr, 10% sys >> >> Denormalized >> >> 44% usr, 0.3% sys >> &g

Re: Denormalization leads to terrible, rather than better, Cassandra performance -- I am really puzzled

n. > >- Why are there so many exceptions in the de-normalized case? I would > think Cassandra should be able to handle simultaneous accesses to the same >data. Why are there NO exceptions for the normalized case? I meant that the > environments for the two cases are b

Denormalization leads to terrible, rather than better, Cassandra performance -- I am really puzzled

e with Java Driver? Or did I do something wrong? -- View this message in context: http://cassandra-user-incubator-apache-org.3065146.n2.nabble.com/Denormalization-leads-to-terrible-rather-than-better-Cassandra-performance-I-am-really-puzzled-tp7600561.html Sent from the cassandra-u...@incubator.a