I thought I'd give this a try:
create columnfamily
at_event__ac_c
(
ac_c text,
ac_creation bigint,
ac_name text,
ac_value text,
PRIMARY KEY (ac_c, ac_creation)
) with compression_parameters:sstable_compression = '';
Then, insert a few columns:
begin batch using
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 10:49 PM, Leonid Ilyevsky
lilyev...@mooncapital.com wrote:
At this point I am really confused about what direction Cassandra is going.
CQL 3 has the benefit of composite keys, but no dynamic columns.
I thought, the whole point of Cassandra was to provide dynamic tables.
waiting for your confirmation, I am going to try it.
-Original Message-
From: Sylvain Lebresne [mailto:sylv...@datastax.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 8:24 AM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: Dynamic CF
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 10:49 PM, Leonid Ilyevsky
lilyev...@mooncapital.com
I think he means something like having a fixed set of coiumns in the table
definition, then in the actual rows having other columns not specified in
the defintion, indepentent of the composited part of the PK. When I
reviewed CQL3 for using in Gossie[1] I realized I couldn't have this, and
that it
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Carlos Carrasco
carlos.carra...@groupalia.com wrote:
I think he means something like having a fixed set of coiumns in the table
definition, then in the actual rows having other columns not specified in
the defintion, indepentent of the composited part of the
it
won't work at all, but also because the whole point of CQL3 is to hide
that kind of complexity.
--
Sylvain
-Original Message-
From: Sylvain Lebresne [mailto:sylv...@datastax.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 8:24 AM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: Dynamic CF
On Fri
I am confused then. I remember reviewing the source for CQL3 and finding
that the row reader used the column count in the CF definition in order to
find how many columns it needed to read a single row. I guess I missed a
filter over the composited part or that I reviewed an old version.
On 10
-
From: Sylvain Lebresne [mailto:sylv...@datastax.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 10:37 AM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: Dynamic CF
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Leonid Ilyevsky
lilyev...@mooncapital.com wrote:
So I guess, in the batch_mutate call, in the map that I pass
I see now there is a package org.apache.cassandra.cql3.statements, with
BatchStatement class. Is this what I should use?
-Original Message-
From: Leonid Ilyevsky [mailto:lilyev...@mooncapital.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 11:45 AM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: RE: Dynamic CF
you can use the cqlsh help but it will eventually refer you to a cql reference
such as this one that says what the options are. Looks like you need just
'default_validation'.
http://www.datastax.com/docs/1.0/references/cql/index#cql-column-family-storage-parameters
On Jul 6, 2012, at 2:13 PM,
[mailto:jeremy.hanna1...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2012 4:06 PM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: Dynamic CF
you can use the cqlsh help but it will eventually refer you to a cql reference
such as this one that says what the options are. Looks like you need just
'default_validation
06, 2012 4:16 PM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: RE: Dynamic CF
Thanks Jeremy, but this doesn't work for me. I am using cql3, because I need
new features like composite keys. The manual you pointed to is for 2.0.
I have suspicion that cql3 does not support dynamic tables at all
[mailto:jeremy.hanna1...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2012 4:06 PM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: Dynamic CF
you can use the cqlsh help but it will eventually refer you to a cql
reference such as this one that says what the options are. Looks like you
need just 'default_validation
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Leonid Ilyevsky
lilyev...@mooncapital.comwrote:
At this point I am really confused about what direction Cassandra is
going. CQL 3 has the benefit of composite keys, but no dynamic columns.
I thought, the whole point of Cassandra was to provide dynamic tables.
:58 PM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: Dynamic CF
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Leonid Ilyevsky
lilyev...@mooncapital.commailto:lilyev...@mooncapital.com wrote:
At this point I am really confused about what direction Cassandra is going. CQL
3 has the benefit of composite keys
a table with
even more rows; I wanted wide rows so the reads and writes would be more
efficient.
** **
*From:* Derek Williams [mailto:de...@fyrie.net]
*Sent:* Friday, July 06, 2012 4:58 PM
*To:* user@cassandra.apache.org
*Subject:* Re: Dynamic CF
** **
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 2
.
** **
*From:* Derek Williams [mailto:de...@fyrie.net]
*Sent:* Friday, July 06, 2012 4:58 PM
*To:* user@cassandra.apache.org
*Subject:* Re: Dynamic CF
** **
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Leonid Ilyevsky
lilyev...@mooncapital.com wrote:
At this point I am really confused
17 matches
Mail list logo
