Re: Mutation dropped

2013-02-24 Thread aaron morton
h. Our 50th percentile was >> great under 3ms. >> >> Any suggestion is very much appreciated. >> >> Thanks. >> -Wei >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "aaron morton" >> To: "Cassandra User" >> Sent: Thursday

Re: Mutation dropped

2013-02-23 Thread Víctor Hugo Oliveira Molinar
lient side and we see the 95th > percentile response time averages at 40ms which is a bit high. Our 50th > percentile was great under 3ms. > > Any suggestion is very much appreciated. > > Thanks. > -Wei > > - Original Message - > From: "aaron morton"

Re: Mutation dropped

2013-02-22 Thread aaron morton
th percentile was > great under 3ms. > > Any suggestion is very much appreciated. > > Thanks. > -Wei > > - Original Message - > From: "aaron morton" > To: "Cassandra User" > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 9:20:49 AM > Subject:

Re: Mutation dropped

2013-02-21 Thread Wei Zhu
bit high. Our 50th percentile was great under 3ms. Any suggestion is very much appreciated. Thanks. -Wei - Original Message - From: "aaron morton" To: "Cassandra User" Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 9:20:49 AM Subject: Re: Mutation dropped > What does rpc_ti

Re: Mutation dropped

2013-02-21 Thread aaron morton
s. > -Wei > > From: aaron morton > To: user@cassandra.apache.org > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 7:32 PM > Subject: Re: Mutation dropped > >> Does the rpc_timeout not control the client timeout ? > No it is how long a node will wait for a response from other nodes before >

Re: Mutation dropped

2013-02-20 Thread Wei Zhu
umber, say 20ms? Thanks. -Wei From: aaron morton To: user@cassandra.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 7:32 PM Subject: Re: Mutation dropped Does the rpc_timeout not control the client timeout ?No it is how long a node will wait for a response from

Re: Mutation dropped

2013-02-19 Thread aaron morton
; which is configurable to control the replication timeout between nodes ? Or > the same param is used to control that since the other node is also like a > client ? > > > > From: aaron morton [mailto:aa...@thelastpickle.com] > Sent: 17 February 2013 11:26 > To: user@ca

RE: Mutation dropped

2013-02-18 Thread Kanwar Sangha
...@thelastpickle.com] Sent: 17 February 2013 11:26 To: user@cassandra.apache.org Subject: Re: Mutation dropped You are hitting the maximum throughput on the cluster. The messages are dropped because the node fails to start processing them before rpc_timeout. However the request is still a success because the

Re: Mutation dropped

2013-02-17 Thread aaron morton
You are hitting the maximum throughput on the cluster. The messages are dropped because the node fails to start processing them before rpc_timeout. However the request is still a success because the client requested CL was achieved. Testing with RF 2 and CL 1 really just tests the disks on

RE: Mutation dropped

2013-02-14 Thread Kanwar Sangha
Hi - Is there a parameter which can be tuned to prevent the mutations from being dropped ? Is this logic correct ? Node A and B with RF=2, CL =1. Load balanced between the two. -- Address Load Tokens Owns (effective) Host ID Rack UN 10.x.x.x

Re: Mutation Dropped Messages

2012-03-06 Thread aaron morton
...@thelastpickle.com] > Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 11:07 PM > To: user@cassandra.apache.org > Subject: Re: Mutation Dropped Messages > > I increased the size of the cluster also the concurrent_writes parameter. > Still there is a node which keeps on dropping the mutation m

RE: Mutation Dropped Messages

2012-03-06 Thread Tiwari, Dushyant
Subject: Re: Mutation Dropped Messages I increased the size of the cluster also the concurrent_writes parameter. Still there is a node which keeps on dropping the mutation messages. Ensure all the nodes have the same spec, and the nodes have the same config. In a virtual environment consider moving the

Re: Mutation Dropped Messages

2012-03-05 Thread aaron morton
; Thanks, > Dushyant > > From: aaron morton [mailto:aa...@thelastpickle.com] > Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 4:15 PM > To: user@cassandra.apache.org > Subject: Re: Mutation Dropped Messages > > 1. Which parameters to tune in the config files? – Especially looking > f

RE: Mutation Dropped Messages

2012-03-05 Thread Tiwari, Dushyant
orton [mailto:aa...@thelastpickle.com] Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 4:15 PM To: user@cassandra.apache.org Subject: Re: Mutation Dropped Messages 1. Which parameters to tune in the config files? - Especially looking for heavy writes The node is overloaded. It may be because there are no enough node

RE: Mutation Dropped Messages

2012-03-05 Thread Tiwari, Dushyant
...@thelastpickle.com] Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 4:15 PM To: user@cassandra.apache.org Subject: Re: Mutation Dropped Messages 1. Which parameters to tune in the config files? - Especially looking for heavy writes The node is overloaded. It may be because there are no enough nodes, or the node is

Re: Mutation Dropped Messages

2012-03-05 Thread aaron morton
> 1. Which parameters to tune in the config files? – Especially looking > for heavy writes The node is overloaded. It may be because there are no enough nodes, or the node is under temporary stress such as GC or repair. If you have spare IO / CPU capacity you could increase the current_wri