Re: Minor Compactions Not Triggered

2015-06-06 Thread Anuj Wadehra
Hi Robert, I haven't yet asked that question in IRC channel. We are generating regular sstables in CF so that's not a concern. Important part is that we need to understand tombstone_threshold property because we think that it's very important once we have done major compaction. How the huge tabl

Re: Minor Compactions Not Triggered

2015-06-02 Thread Robert Coli
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Anuj Wadehra wrote: > As per the algorithm shared in the CASSANDRA 6654, I understand that > tombstone_threshold property only comes into picture if you have expirying > columns and it wont have any effect if you have manually deleted rows in > cf. Is my understan

Re: Minor Compactions Not Triggered

2015-06-01 Thread Anuj Wadehra
Thanks Robert !!! As per the algorithm shared in the CASSANDRA 6654, I understand that tombstone_threshold property only comes into picture if you have expirying columns and it wont have any effect if you have manually deleted rows in cf. Is my understanding correct? According to you What wo

Re: Minor Compactions Not Triggered

2015-06-01 Thread Robert Coli
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Anuj Wadehra wrote: > 2. We thought that CQL compaction subproperty of *tombstone_threshold* > will help us after major compactions. This property will ensure that even > if we have one huge sstable, once tombstone threshold of 20% has reached, > sstables will be