On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:16 PM, David Boxenhorn wrote:
> What do you mean by, "The included secondary indexes still aren't good at
> finding keys for ranges of indexed values, such as " name > 'b' and name <
> 'c' "."?
>
> Do you mean that secondary indexes don't support range queries at all?
ht
What do you mean by, "The included secondary indexes still aren't good at
finding keys for ranges of indexed values, such as " name > 'b' and name <
'c' "."?
Do you mean that secondary indexes don't support range queries at all?
Besides supporting range queries, I see the importance of secondary
OPP is not yet obsolete.
The included secondary indexes still aren't good at finding keys for ranges
of indexed values, such as " name > 'b' and name < 'c' ". This is something
that an OPP index would be good at. Of course, you can do something similar
with one or more rows, so it's not that big
- OPP becomes obsolete (OOP is not obsolete!)
- primary indexes become obsolete if you ever want to do a range query
(which you probably will...), better to assign a random row id
Taken together, it's likely that very little will remain of your old
database schema...
Am I right?
It seems to me that secondary indexes (new in 0.7) change everything when it
comes to data modeling.
- OOP becomes obsolete
- primary indexes become obsolete if you ever want to do a range query
(which you probably will...), better to assign a random row id
Taken together, it's likely that very l
