On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 6:14 PM Oleksandr Shulgin <
oleksandr.shul...@zalando.de> wrote:
>
> I was wondering about this again, as I've noticed one of the nodes in our
> cluster accumulating ten times the number of files compared to the average
> across the rest of cluster. The files are all comin
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 9:55 PM Jonathan Haddad wrote:
> My coworker Alex (from The Last Pickle) wrote an in depth blog post on
> TWCS. We recommend not running repair on tables that use TWCS.
>
> http://thelastpickle.com/blog/2016/12/08/TWCS-part1.html
>
Hi,
I was wondering about this again,
Beautiful, thank you very much!
From: Jonathan Haddad [mailto:j...@jonhaddad.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 4:55 PM
To: user
Subject: Re: To Repair or Not to Repair
My coworker Alex (from The Last Pickle) wrote an in depth blog post on TWCS.
We recommend not running repair on tables that
My coworker Alex (from The Last Pickle) wrote an in depth blog post on
TWCS. We recommend not running repair on tables that use TWCS.
http://thelastpickle.com/blog/2016/12/08/TWCS-part1.html
It's enough of a problem that we added a feature into Reaper to
auto-blacklist TWCS / DTCS tables from be
It seems that running a repair works really well, quickly and efficiently when
repairing a column family that does not use TWCS. Has anyone else had a similar
experience? Wondering if running TWCS is doing more harm than good as it chews
up a lot of cpu and for extended periods of time in compar
