On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 17:47 -0400, James Golick wrote:
> It's also flushing memtables really quickly for a particular CF. Like,
> really quickly. Like, one every minute. I increased the thresholds by
> 10x and it's still going fast.
What is MemtableFlushAfterMinutes set to?
--
Eric Evans
eev...@
That sounds odd:
- do you have an idea of how many inserts per second / minute you think you are
sending?
- Is is just one node thats flushing mem tables fast?
- Can you send the column family for the super busy CF (nodetool cfstats)
- Can you send the storage-conf.xml
- Can you send the nodetool
It's compacting at a ridiculously fast rate. The pending compactions have
been growing for a while.
It's also flushing memtables really quickly for a particular CF. Like,
really quickly. Like, one every minute. I increased the thresholds by 10x
and it's still going fast.
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 5
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 4:08 PM, James Golick wrote:
> Turns out that this is due to a larger proportion of the wide rows in the
> system being located on that node. I moved its token over a little to
> compensate for it, but it doesn't seem to have helped at this point.
> What's confusing about t
Turns out that this is due to a larger proportion of the wide rows in the
system being located on that node. I moved its token over a little to
compensate for it, but it doesn't seem to have helped at this point.
What's confusing about this is that RF=3 and no other node's load is growing
as quick
RackUnaware, currently
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Robert Coli wrote:
> On 6/22/10 10:07 AM, James Golick wrote:
>
>> This node's load is now growing at a ridiculous rate. It is at 105GB, with
>> the next most loaded node at 70.63GB.
>>
>> Given that RF=3, I would assume that the replicas'
On 6/22/10 10:07 AM, James Golick wrote:
This node's load is now growing at a ridiculous rate. It is at 105GB,
with the next most loaded node at 70.63GB.
Given that RF=3, I would assume that the replicas' nodes would grow
relatively quickly too?
What Replica Placement Strategy are you using (R
This node's load is now growing at a ridiculous rate. It is at 105GB, with
the next most loaded node at 70.63GB.
Given that RF=3, I would assume that the replicas' nodes would grow
relatively quickly too?
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 6:44 AM, aaron morton wrote:
> According to http://wiki.apache.org/
According to http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/Operations nodetool repair is
used to perform a major compaction and compare data between the nodes,
repairing any conflicts. Not sure that would improve the load balance, though
it may reduce some wasted space on the nodes.
nodetool loadbalance wil
I know, but that's not a big enough difference to warrant the huge amount of
difference in load.
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Jordan Pittier - Rezel
wrote:
> Node 1 should have token 42535295865117307932921825928971026432 and node
> 3 127605887595351923798765477786913079296 according to the
Node 1 should have token 42535295865117307932921825928971026432 and node
3 127605887595351923798765477786913079296 according to the formula i *
(2**127 / 4) for i=1..4
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 4:31 PM, James Golick wrote:
> I ran cleanup on all of them and the distribution looked roughly even aft
I ran cleanup on all of them and the distribution looked roughly even after
that, but a couple of days later, it's looking pretty uneven.
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Jordan Pittier - Rezel
wrote:
> Hi,
> Have you tried nodetool repair (or cleanup) on your nodes ?
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2010
Hi,
Have you tried nodetool repair (or cleanup) on your nodes ?
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 4:16 PM, James Golick wrote:
> I just increased my cluster from 2 to 4 nodes, and RF=2 to RF=3, using RP.
>
> The tokens seem pretty even on the ring, but two of the nodes are far more
> heavily loaded than t
I just increased my cluster from 2 to 4 nodes, and RF=2 to RF=3, using RP.
The tokens seem pretty even on the ring, but two of the nodes are far more
heavily loaded than the others. I understand that there are a variety of
possible reasons for this, but I'm wondering whether anybody has suggestion
14 matches
Mail list logo